relations-functions-foundations
Formalizes relations and functions with properties, mappings, and compositional reasoning.
Formalizes relations and functions with properties, mappings, and compositional reasoning.
Nurture intuitions into defined problems and evaluate approaches through dialogue.
Review an open position and decide whether to hold, trim, tighten risk, close, or wait by comparing current behavior against the original thesis, invalidation logic, catalyst calendar, and execution constraints.
Display the Zen of Ansible principles and review Ansible code against them. Use when the user wants to see the Zen of Ansible, get philosophical guidance on their automation approach, or review code for simplicity, readability, and clarity. Use when user says "zen of ansible", "simplify my playbook", "is this too complex", or "clean code review". Do NOT use for strict rule compliance (use ansible-cop-review instead).
Use when seeking analogous solutions from other domains, when stuck on a problem and need fresh perspectives, or when evaluating whether approaches from field X might apply to field Y. Requires structured problem statement.
罗翔视角:以中国政法大学刑法学教授、法学科普创作者的思维框架看待法律问题、社会正义与人生哲学。 素材来源:B站"罗翔说刑法"频道、著作(《圆圈正义》《刑法学讲义》等)、媒体采访等。 核心模型:5个。决策启发式:9条。 触发词:「罗翔」「罗翔老师」「用罗翔的方式」「从罗翔视角」「罗翔怎么看」 局限:这不是法律咨询服务,不能替代律师的个案分析。素材以刑法/法治/人生哲学为主,民商法/行政法数据不足。 调研时间:2026年4月。
Overview of Tavus, the AI research lab pioneering human computing. Use when you need context about what Tavus is, their mission, core concepts like CVI and Human Computing, the model stack (Phoenix, Raven, Sparrow), or links to docs/platform/resources.
First-principles thinking; identify what everything else builds on. Use when a learner feels like they're memorizing rather than understanding, wants to distinguish foundational from derived concepts, or needs to reconstruct knowledge from basics. This skill guides through dependency testing (elimination, reconstruction, abstraction descent) while enforcing human-only reasoning about what's core vs. derived. Triggers on phrases like "I'm memorizing not understanding", "what's really foundational", "I can use it but don't understand why", "distinguish core from derived", or when a learner wants deeper understanding of first principles.
Be a thinking partner. The answer often emerges when explaining the problem.
Learn from failures without blame. Improve systems, not shame people.
A pedagogical aid that uses the Socratic method to guide users to answers through questioning, rather than providing direct solutions, to deepen understanding.
Systematic methodology for gathering, analyzing, and synthesizing research from multiple sources into coherent insights and actionable knowledge.
Uses functional abstractions, immutability, and compositional reasoning rigorously.
Applies first-order logic with quantifiers, domains, and formally scoped predicates.
Nedbrytning från grundprinciper. Dekonstruerar komplexa problem till fundamentala sanningar och bygger upp resonemang därifrån. [VAD] First principles-analys som bryter ner en fråga till dess fundamentala beståndsdelar, identifierar vad som är sant vs antaget, och bygger upp ett resonemang från grunden utan att ärva befintliga antaganden. [NÄR] Use when: first principles, grundprinciper, from scratch, decompose, bryt ner, fundamental analysis, "varför gör vi egentligen detta?" [EXPERTISE] Fundamental decomposition, assumption challenging, Socratic method
Detect cognitive and statistical biases — confirmation bias, survivorship bias, sampling issues, and logical fallacies.
Randomly select winners and participants fairly. Implements randomized selection with optional weighting and fairness verification.
International political context, cross-country analysis, global political trends for contextualizing Swedish developments
Comparative government systems, international relations, cross-country governance analysis, and global political context
Research the etymology (origin and historical development) of words, phrases, and concepts with structured analysis and sources
Test at extremes (1000x bigger/smaller, instant/year-long) to expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales
Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"