Structures informed consent documentation with risks, benefits, alternatives, and patient understanding confirmation. Use when obtaining informed consent, documenting consent discussions, or verifying consent completeness.
Structures EMTALA-compliant inter-facility transfer documentation and stabilization requirements. Use when arranging emergency transfers, ensuring EMTALA compliance, or documenting transfer decisions.
Evaluates physician self-referral arrangements against Stark Law exceptions with documentation. Use when analyzing Stark compliance, evaluating referral arrangements, or documenting exception applicability.
Evaluates billing practices for False Claims Act risk with qui tam and voluntary disclosure considerations. Use when assessing FCA risk, evaluating billing compliance, or considering self-disclosure.
Evaluates payment arrangements against Anti-Kickback Statute safe harbors with documentation. Use when analyzing AKS compliance, evaluating compensation arrangements, or documenting safe harbor applicability.
Drafts wrongful termination complaints for employment litigation. Covers at-will exceptions, statutory claims (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, state equivalents), public policy violations, and whistleblower protections. Use when drafting or filing a wrongful termination complaint or related employment discharge claim.
Drafts Written Consents in Lieu of Meeting for corporate boards or shareholders. Ensures compliance with state corporate law (e.g., DGCL §§141(f), 228), bylaws, and governing documents. Use when drafting board consent, shareholder consent, unanimous written consent, action by written consent, or consent in lieu of meeting.
Drafts a U.S. corporate Action by Written Consent of Incorporator for post-formation organizational actions (adopting bylaws, appointing directors, transitioning authority to board). Use when the prompt mentions "written consent," "incorporator," "formation filing," "adopt bylaws," "appoint initial directors," or "organize corporation."
Drafts U.S. corporate written-consent instruments (board, shareholder, member) as substitutes for formal meetings. Triggers when counsel requests board consent, shareholder written consent, unanimous consent, consent-in-lieu approvals, or "action without meeting" for contracts, financing, equity issuance, officer delegation, or governing-document amendments. Produces jurisdiction-aware approval records with threshold validation and execution mechanics.
Maintain a structured Setup/Payoff ledger (promises, debts, payoffs) and generate a payoff roadmap.
Consulte les armes, armures et équipement BFRPG. Dégâts, CA, coût, propriétés. Utilisez pour vérifier l'équipement des personnages.
Assess readiness for compliance audits. Use when a senior developer needs a gap analysis for standards.
Threat modeling methodologies (STRIDE, DREAD), attack trees, threat modeling as code, and integration with SDLC for proactive security design
Use when making predictions or judgments under uncertainty and need to explicitly update beliefs with new evidence. Invoke when forecasting outcomes, evaluating probabilities, testing hypotheses, calibrating confidence, assessing risks with uncertain data, or avoiding overconfidence bias. Use when user mentions priors, likelihoods, Bayes theorem, probability updates, forecasting, calibration, or belief revision.
Use when making decisions under uncertainty with quantifiable outcomes, comparing risky options (investments, product bets, strategic choices), prioritizing projects by expected return, assessing whether to take a gamble, or when user mentions expected value, EV calculation, risk-adjusted return, probability-weighted outcomes, decision tree, or needs to choose between uncertain alternatives.
Use when comparing multiple named alternatives across several criteria, need transparent trade-off analysis, making group decisions requiring alignment, choosing between vendors/tools/strategies, stakeholders need to see decision rationale, balancing competing priorities (cost vs quality vs speed), user mentions "which option should we choose", "compare alternatives", "evaluate vendors", "trade-offs", or when decision needs to be defensible and data-driven.
Wardley Mapping for strategic positioning and situational awareness. Covers value chain mapping, evolution stages, landscape analysis, gameplay patterns, and strategic decision-making. Use for technology strategy, competitive analysis, and architectural investment decisions.
Use when decisions could affect groups differently and need to anticipate harms/benefits, assess fairness and safety concerns, identify vulnerable populations, propose risk mitigations, define monitoring metrics, or when user mentions ethical review, impact assessment, differential harm, safety analysis, vulnerable groups, bias audit, or responsible AI/tech.
Use to convert probabilities into decisions (bet/pass/hedge) and optimize scoring. Invoke when need to calculate edge, size bets optimally (Kelly Criterion), extremize aggregated forecasts, or improve Brier scores. Use when user mentions betting strategy, Kelly, edge calculation, Brier score, extremizing, or translating belief into action.
Use when planning with fixed deadline or target outcome, working backward from future goal to present, defining milestones and dependencies, mapping critical path, identifying what must happen when, planning product launches with hard dates, multi-year strategic roadmaps, event planning, transformation initiatives, or when user mentions "backcast", "work backward from", "reverse planning", "we need to launch by", "target date is", or "what needs to happen to reach".
Use when planning high-stakes initiatives (migrations, launches, strategic changes) that require clear specifications, proactive risk identification (premortem/register), and measurable success criteria. Invoke when user mentions "plan this migration", "launch strategy", "implementation roadmap", "what could go wrong", "how do we measure success", or when high-impact decisions need comprehensive planning with risk mitigation and instrumentation.
Use when facing decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions. Invoke when stakeholders have competing priorities (growth vs. sustainability, speed vs. quality, innovation vs. risk), need to pressure-test ideas from different angles before committing, exploring tradeoffs between incompatible values, synthesizing conflicting expert opinions into coherent strategy, or surfacing assumptions that single-viewpoint analysis would miss.
Assess and prioritize tech debt items. Use when a senior developer needs an investment plan for debt reduction.
