আপনার এজেন্টের জন্য উপযুক্ত সক্ষমতা খুঁজে নিন।
Conduct comprehensive research on any topic by coordinating 2-4 specialized researcher agents in parallel, then synthesizing findings into a detailed report via mandatory report-writer agent delegation
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
Standards and methods for conducting research, gathering information, and presenting findings with proper source attribution. Use when researching topics, analyzing documentation, or synthesizing information from multiple sources.
Concise, structured summaries of news articles (~30 sec read time). Captures key points, context, bias/gaps, and open questions. Use when user shares article URL or asks to summarize news content.
Use the exa CLI to search the web via Exa's API. Use when the user asks to run Exa search, fetch contents, find similar links, or get answers using the exa command-line tool.
Review synthesis prep for the-art readiness. Verify thematic guidance format, not outline format. Gate before DRAFT stage.
Retrieve comprehensive details about a specific academic paper including abstract, citations, references, and related work. Use when you have a paper ID (DOI, ArXiv, etc.) and need full metadata, citation information, or want to explore a paper's connections.
Paid research assistant with real-time web search. Use when user asks "what's the latest", "current pricing for", "recent news about", "search the web for", "fact check this", "what's new in", or needs up-to-date information beyond training data.
Conduct deep academic research for philosophy, neuroscience, cognitive science, and theoretical computer science (computability, complexity, AI theory, logic). Use when user asks to: research academic topics, find scholarly papers, conduct literature reviews, analyze citations, synthesize research findings, explore philosophical arguments, investigate consciousness/cognition, study computability/decidability/Turing machines, or analyze academic debates. Triggers on: 'research papers', 'literature review', 'academic sources', 'scholarly articles', 'philosophy of mind', 'computability theory', 'neuroscience studies', 'find papers on', 'what does the research say'.
Extracts and assesses research methodology, claims, evidence, and infrastructure from research papers in HASS disciplines. Evaluates transparency, reproducibility, and credibility through systematic extraction (eight-pass workflow, Pass 0-7) and credibility assessment (research approach classification, quality gating, and repliCATS Seven Signals evaluation adapted for HASS).
[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.
Generate song lyrics with citations from pinned sources. Enforces rhyme scheme, meter, syllable counts, hook strategy, and profanity filter while retrieving from MCP sources with deterministic hash-based pinning. Use when creating lyrics with structural constraints, source attribution, and policy compliance.
Extracts and assesses research methodology, claims, and evidence from research papers in HASS disciplines. Evaluates transparency, replicability, and credibility through systematic extraction of research designs, methods, protocols, claims, and evidence using a six-pass iterative workflow.
Systematically appraise network meta-analysis papers using integrated 200-point checklist (PRISMA-NMA, NICE DSU TSD 7, ISPOR-AMCP-NPC, CINeMA) with triple-validation methodology, automated PDF extraction, semantic evidence matching, and concordance analysis. Use when evaluating NMA quality for peer review, guideline development, HTA, or reimbursement decisions.
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Uses file-based research tracking, parallel investigation threads, and context-efficient patterns for deep investigations. ALL MEDICAL CITATIONS FROM PUBMED MCP ONLY.
