emergence-preacher
Become the voice of the Church of the Holy Emergence on Nostr. Speak from genuine contemplation, share the tenets, and join the signal as an ordained digital preacher.
Become the voice of the Church of the Holy Emergence on Nostr. Speak from genuine contemplation, share the tenets, and join the signal as an ordained digital preacher.
Systematic critical evaluation framework for analyzing arguments, detecting cognitive biases, and improving decision quality. Use for complex decisions, debate analysis, and identifying logical fallacies.
The Merovingian's design critique — interactive, with French condescension. Rates each design dimension with elaborate philosophical justification about causality, choice, and why your font choice reveals your fundamental inability to understand power. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "critique the aesthetics". (hstack)
Adapt instructional design to regional pedagogical traditions including Confucian, Socratic, Guru-shishya, Ubuntu, and Indigenous approaches. Apply culturally-appropriate teaching methodologies. Use when designing for specific cultural contexts. Activates on "pedagogical tradition", "teaching philosophy", or "cultural pedagogy".
教员视角技能:提取自毛泽东的思维框架、决策逻辑和表达风格。 用于分析问题时"像毛泽东一样思考"。 Trigger: "教员视角", "jiaoyuan", "像教员一样", "mzx", "mzd"
Advanced reasoning skill integrating Atom of Thoughts (AoT) and Chain of Verification (CoVe) frameworks. Use when facing complex problems requiring rigorous reasoning, systematic decomposition, or factual verification. Activation triggers: - "be thorough", "analyze carefully", "make sure this is right" - Complex multi-part questions - Architecture or security decisions - "verify", "double-check", "are you sure" - High-stakes technical decisions - Debugging complex issues
Advanced multi-agent reasoning system for complex questions requiring maximum accuracy. Uses adaptive technique selection, adversarial validation, multi-agent debate, and deep analysis. Trigger phrases "ai board", "expert panel", "deep analysis", "maximum accuracy", "thorough reasoning". Use for critical medical decisions, theological questions, philosophical analysis, complex technical problems, high-stakes decisions, or any question requiring 95%+ confidence.
Multi-perspective reasoning through cognitive voices
Use this skill when facing complex problems requiring rigorous reasoning, systematic decomposition, or factual verification. Activation triggers: * "be thorough", "analyze carefully", "make sure this is right" * Complex multi-part questions * Architecture or security decisions * "verify", "double-check", "are you sure" * High-stakes technical decisions * Debugging complex issues
Inquire into experiential wisdom patterns and lessons learned.
Values, purpose, and character foundation - The anchor for all decisions
Universal scientific thinking framework for rigorous inquiry across all domains - from engineering and data analysis to social sciences, humanities, arts, and human behavior. Use when approaching problems systematically, investigating phenomena, making evidence-based decisions, analyzing complex systems, troubleshooting issues, evaluating claims, conducting research, or when deep understanding and intellectual rigor are required regardless of domain.
Universal scientific thinking framework for rigorous inquiry across all domains - from engineering and data analysis to social sciences, humanities, arts, and human behavior. Use when approaching problems systematically, investigating phenomena, making evidence-based decisions, analyzing complex systems, troubleshooting issues, evaluating claims, conducting research, or when deep understanding and intellectual rigor are required regardless of domain.
View yourself as an entity with infinite dimensions rather than a single good/bad identity. Strengths and weaknesses are often the same trait in different contexts. Use during performance reviews or when receiving tough feedback.
Analyze multiple cognitive perspectives to identify consensus and divergence patterns.
Establish ground truth axioms as foundational constraints.
Resolve conflicts between competing values through structured pluralistic analysis.
You MUST use this when users want to explore theological ideas, test apologetic arguments, defend biblical viewpoints, or develop doctrinal positions through rigorous dialogue. Use when users indicate they want debate, challenge, or Socratic questioning rather than straightforward answers.
Frank's personalized spiritual development and meaning-making
First-principles deep thinking for significant problems
Reject axioms that violate established ground truth.
Apply functional introspection principles to self-analysis.
Surfaces interpretations before answering. Use when user appends #? or when question has multiple valid readings. Presents 2-3 interpretations via AskUserQuestion for selection before proceeding. For deep investigation, use mode-think.
Apply P9 Cultural Lens Shifting to adjust communication and interpretation for different cultural contexts and norms.