database-comparison-guide
Compare major academic databases and when to use each for research
Compare major academic databases and when to use each for research
Search EU-funded research outputs via the OpenAIRE Graph API
Navigate MeSH vocabulary for precise PubMed and MEDLINE searches
Query the OpenAlex catalog of scholarly works, authors, and institutions
Historical research from primary sources to scholarly analysis
Search papers and analyze citation graphs via OpenAlex and CrossRef APIs
Master Boolean operators and advanced search syntax for academic databases
Checklist-driven academic English polishing and Chinglish correction
Search biomedical literature and retrieve records via PubMed E-utilities
Search multiple academic databases simultaneously with Findpapers
Review and polish LaTeX research papers for clarity and style
Search the web with LLM-optimized results via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to search the web, find articles, look up information, get recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what's the latest on", "find articles about", or needs current information from the internet. Returns relevant results with content snippets, relevance scores, and metadata — optimized for LLM consumption. Supports domain filtering, time ranges, and multiple search depths.
OpenClaw personalized paper recommendation skill. When the user invokes /aminer-rec5 or /skill aminer-rec5 in Feishu, immediately run the local pipeline under {baseDir}/scripts/, accept aminer_user_id, scholar hints, seed paper titles, papers_file, or free-form topic text, build a unified ResearchProfile, retrieve papers, enrich with AMiner, dispatch Feishu cards, and return NO_REPLY.
Research any topic via web search and synthesize findings into a structured, actionable report. Spawns parallel research agents to gather diverse perspectives, cross-references sources, and progressively builds context from fundamentals to nuance. Use when investigating a technology, comparing approaches, evaluating tools, understanding best practices, or learning about any technical or non-technical topic. Keywords: research, web search, investigate, compare, evaluate, learn, best practices, how does, what is, pros cons, trade-offs, state of the art
Use when a research question is still vague and must be clarified into a structured deep-research brief before actual literature research or execution. Skip this if the user already has a concrete paper draft or a ready-to-run research specification.
Use when a mostly complete ML conference paper needs self-review, pre-submission QA, camera-ready checking, section-by-section critique, citation-risk inspection, or rebuttal/review-response drafting. Skip this for initial drafting and use `paperreview` only when the user explicitly wants external submission.
学术论文写作助手,专门用于 LaTeX 论文编写、BibTeX 管理、格式化、学术写作规范检查。适用于 AI/ML 研究论文、会议投稿(NeurIPS、ICML、ICLR 等)
This skill should be used when writing official conference-style reviews for research papers as if from a top-tier systems conference reviewer. Use when the author wants a realistic, formal peer review with scores, strengths, weaknesses, and detailed feedback following standard conference review formats.
Format citations and bibliographies in multiple academic styles (APA, IEEE, Chicago, Harvard, MLA, Nature, Science). Use when: (1) Converting between citation styles for different journals, (2) Cleaning and standardizing bibliography entries, (3) Validating citation formatting before submission, (4) Generating properly formatted reference lists, (5) Checking citation consistency across manuscripts.
Search and query Calibre library databases. Use when the user asks about books, TBR (to-be-read), reading lists, Calibre library queries, book searches, or mentions Calibre. Also use for queries about book ratings, authors, reading status, or library statistics.
Applies rigorous critical analysis to evaluate claims, arguments, and research. Use when evaluating evidence quality, peer reviewing content, assessing argument validity, or identifying weaknesses in reasoning. Triggers on phrases like "critically analyze", "evaluate this", "review this paper", "check the logic", "assess the evidence", "find flaws", "peer review".
Validate claims against sources and score confidence; use when asked to verify research output accuracy.
Analyze argument structure, identify logical gaps, suggest evidence needs, generate counterarguments, apply claim-evidence-warrant framework. Use when strengthening arguments, analyzing persuasive writing, checking logical validity, or when user asks to improve reasoning or logic.
Use when writing or reviewing NIH, NSF, or foundation grant proposals. Invoke when user mentions specific aims, R01, R21, K-series, significance, innovation, approach section, grant writing, proposal review, research strategy, or needs help with fundable hypothesis, reviewer-friendly structure, or compliance with grant guidelines.