home/categories/academic
category focus

Academic

Papers, citations, and university tools.

2468 skillsall categories
sorting
stars
current ordering strategy
query
all entries
refine the visible subset
academic
156

scienceclaw-query

Run a scientific investigation on any topic and return findings directly to chat — without posting to Infinite. Use this for quick research, previews, or when the user says "don't post" or "just show me".

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

scienceclaw-post

Generate a structured scientific post and publish it to Infinite. Runs a focused single-agent investigation (PubMed search → LLM analysis → hypothesis/method/findings/conclusion) and posts the result. Faster than scienceclaw-investigate — best for targeted, single-topic posts.

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

citation-management

Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

websearch

Search the web for scientific information using DuckDuckGo

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

pubmed

Search PubMed for scientific literature and retrieve abstracts

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

peer-review

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

osti-database

Search OSTI.gov for DOE technical reports on critical minerals, energy, and materials science

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

literature-review

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

literature-meta-search

Unified search across OSTI, Google Scholar, ArXiv, and corpus-search with deduplication and reciprocal rank fusion

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

minerals-news-monitor

Discover critical-minerals and materials signals from newspapers, blogs, and industry media using web search, with normalized policy/commodity tagging

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
156

serpapi

SerpApi search engine results API via curl. Use this skill to scrape Google, Bing, YouTube, and other search engines.

nicepkg
nicepkg
research
open
academic
156

openalex-database

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.

lamm-mit
lamm-mit
research
open
academic
155

manuscript-provenance

Computational provenance audit verifying that every number, table, figure, ordering, and terminology in a manuscript is derived from code and scripts — not manually entered. Cross-references LaTeX source against the codebase to detect hardcoded values, stale outputs, broken pipelines, and manual data entry. Companion to manuscript-review: that skill audits the document as prose; this skill audits whether the document is faithfully generated from code. Use when the user says "check provenance", "verify reproducibility", "audit my pipeline", "are my numbers from code", "check manuscript against scripts", "provenance audit", or any request to verify that manuscript content traces back to computational outputs.

Mathews-Tom
Mathews-Tom
research
open
academic
155

literature-review

Systematic literature review workflow for surveying, synthesizing, and analyzing academic research. Covers the full lifecycle: scope definition, searching academic databases (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar), screening, structured extraction, thematic synthesis, gap identification, and producing a cited review document. Triggers on: "literature review", "survey the literature", "research landscape", "related work", "systematic review", "scoping review", "synthesize the research", "bibliography on", "find papers about", "review the state of the art", "research gap analysis". Use this skill when surveying a research area, mapping a topic landscape, identifying gaps, or writing a related work section.

Mathews-Tom
Mathews-Tom
research
open
academic
155

manuscript-review

Systematic pre-publication manuscript audit producing a structured refactoring report with section-level diagnostics, citation hygiene analysis, and submission-readiness assessment. Use this skill whenever the user uploads a manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, journal submission, or conference paper and asks for review, feedback, editing, refactoring, pre-submission check, proofreading, or quality audit. Also trigger when the user says "review my paper", "check before submission", "is this ready to submit", "pre-pub checklist", "manuscript review", "refactor my paper", or asks about citation consistency, argument coherence, or formatting compliance. Covers partial requests like "check my references" or "does the abstract work" — the full diagnostic surfaces issues across all facets even when only one was asked about.

Mathews-Tom
Mathews-Tom
research
open
academic
155

research-critique

Critical analysis of research papers, academic manuscripts, preprints, and technical studies — evaluating methodology, claims-evidence alignment, contribution significance, and intellectual honesty. Produces coherent analytical responses (not checklists) that distinguish genuine weaknesses from standard field limitations. Governs intellectual posture: collegial reader, not adversarial reviewer. Triggers on: "critique this paper", "review this research", "what do you think of this paper", "analyze this study", "evaluate the methodology", "is this paper sound", "assess this research", "strengths and weaknesses of this paper", "does the evidence support the claims". Use this skill when the user provides a research paper, preprint, or technical study and asks for critical evaluation of its scientific merit, methodology, or contribution — not formatting, citation hygiene, or submission readiness (use manuscript-review for those).

Mathews-Tom
Mathews-Tom
research
open
academic
154

update-lib-docs

Update library documentation in .claude/docs/libraries/ with latest information from web search.

DeL-TaiseiOzaki
DeL-TaiseiOzaki
research
open
academic
154

research-lib

Research a library and create comprehensive documentation in .claude/docs/libraries/.

DeL-TaiseiOzaki
DeL-TaiseiOzaki
research
open
academic
152

kagi-search

Web search and content extraction via Kagi Search API. Use for searching documentation, facts, or any web content. Lightweight, no browser required.

joelazar
joelazar
research
open
academic
152

research-brief

Deep dive on a topic combining web search, papers, and synthesis

aaronjmars
aaronjmars
research
open
academic
152

paper-pick

Find the one paper you should read today from Hugging Face Papers

aaronjmars
aaronjmars
research
open
academic
152

paper-digest

Find and summarize new papers matching tracked research interests

aaronjmars
aaronjmars
research
open
academic
152

last-30-days

Cross-platform social research — what people are actually saying about a topic across Reddit, X, HN, Polymarket, and the web over the last 30 days

aaronjmars
aaronjmars
research
open
Previous
Page 47 / 103
Next