Build a library of metacognitive prompts targeting planning, monitoring, or evaluation for a specific task. Use when developing students' thinking-about-thinking during independent work.
Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.
Generate scaffolds that gradually increase student choice, voice, and ownership within a learning task. Use when students depend heavily on teacher direction and need to develop autonomy.
Design a moment of awe or wonder that hooks curiosity and deepens emotional engagement with content. Use when opening units, introducing surprising material, or reigniting student interest.
Diagnose motivation problems in a task using self-determination theory and redesign for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Use when students are disengaged, resistant, or going through the motions.
Design a mastery experience sequence that systematically builds student confidence in a skill they avoid. Use when students say 'I can't do this', avoid tasks, or show learned helplessness.
Guides pre-writing planning for academic papers with 4 structured steps: story design (task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage), experiment planning (comparisons + ablations), figure design (pipeline + teaser), and 4-week timeline management. Includes counterintuitive planning tactics (write a mock rejection letter to identify weaknesses before writing, narrow before broad claims, design ablations first). Use when: user wants to plan a paper before writing, design story/contributions, plan experiments, create figure sketches, set a writing timeline, or write a pre-emptive rejection letter for planning purposes. Do NOT use for actual writing (use paper-writing), running experiments (use experiment-pipeline), self-reviewing a finished draft (use paper-review), or finding research problems (use research-ideation).
Guides writing effective rebuttals after receiving peer review feedback. Covers review diagnosis (score-driven color-coding), response strategy (champion identification, common-theme consolidation), tactical writing (18 rules), and counterintuitive rebuttal principles. Use when: user received reviewer scores/comments, needs to write a rebuttal or author response, wants to respond to specific criticism (e.g. 'limited novelty', 'missing baselines'), mentions 'rebuttal', 'reviewer comments', 'author response', or 'respond to reviewers'. Do NOT use for pre-submission self-review (use paper-review instead).
Codex architecture consulting. Use when: designing features, evaluating architecture, getting second opinion on design. Not for: implementation (use codex-implement), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: architecture advice + design recommendations.
Document review via Codex MCP. Use when: reviewing .md docs, tech spec audit, document quality check. Not for: code review (use codex-code-review), test review (use test-review). Output: 5-dimension rating table + gate.
Reference guide for writing effective agent prompts and skills. Use when creating new skills, reviewing prompt quality, or understanding Warden's prompt architecture.
Analyze your Claude Code session logs to improve prompt quality, optimize tool usage, and become a better AI-native engineer.
Beamer LaTeX slide workflow: create, compile, review, and polish academic presentations. Use this skill whenever the user works on Beamer .tex slide decks, or asks to create slides, make a presentation, prepare a lecture, build a talk, or generate Beamer slides from a paper. Covers: creation, editing, compilation, proofreading, visual audit, pedagogical review, TikZ diagrams, figure extraction, and comprehensive quality checks. Trigger on: beamer, slides, lecture, presentation, seminar talk, conference talk, defense slides, tikz, compile latex, proofread slides, slide review, 讨论班, 论文讲解. Do NOT trigger on: powerpoint, pptx, PPT, 做PPT — use the powerpoint-slides skill instead.
Load automatically when user asks to learn Medusa development (e.g., "teach me how to build with medusa", "guide me through medusa", "I want to learn medusa"). Interactive guided tutorial where Claude acts as a coding bootcamp instructor, teaching step-by-step with checkpoints and verification.
Use when the user needs to plan, de-risk, or ground a software engineering / computer science undergraduate thesis from a real codebase before final writing. Trigger for requests such as "根据项目写毕业论文", "先做论文大纲", "用真实项目材料规划论文", "检查论文是否脱离代码", "根据检测报告降查重", "根据AIGC报告改写定稿", "继续在手改初稿上改", or when an existing draft thesis must be reworked against a school format sample. Produces an evidence-backed outline, chapter rewrite plan, figure plan, and handoff package for academic-paper-composer.
Use cli-web-notebooklm to interact with Google NotebookLM — create notebooks, add sources, ask questions, generate artifacts (audio, video, slides, mindmap, study guide, quiz, briefing, infographic, data table). Invoke this skill whenever the user asks about NotebookLM, wants to create notebooks, add sources to a notebook, ask a notebook questions, generate study materials, create presentations, podcasts, or manage NotebookLM content programmatically. Always prefer cli-web-notebooklm over manually browsing NotebookLM.
Universal quality coding process: plan, TDD, reviews. Use whenever code needs to be written — ad-hoc or as part of a task. Use when: "напиши код", "закодь", "реализуй", "write code", "implement" For planning tasks → tech-spec-planning skill. For specs → user-spec-planning skill.
Guide for writing effective prompts for LLMs. Use when: "напиши промпт", "улучши промпт", "prompt engineering", "проверь промпт"
Guide for creating/updating skills with specialized knowledge and workflows. Use when: "создай скилл", "измени скилл", "гайд по скиллам", "обнови скилл", "улучши скилл", "create skill", "update skill", "skill guide", "new skill", "how to write a skill"
Testing methodology: when to write which tests, how to ensure test quality, test pyramid strategy. Use when: "напиши тесты", "как тестировать", "проанализируй тесты", "проверь качество тестов", "ревью тестов", "тестовая стратегия"
Generate structure specifications documenting component dimensions, spacing, padding, and how values change across density, size, and shape variants. Use when the user mentions "structure", "structure spec", "dimensions", "spacing", "density", "sizing", or wants to document a component's dimensional properties.
Iterative rubric-based evaluation and self-improvement loop. Builds a scoring rubric interactively, evaluates an artifact with multiple models in parallel (Codex, Gemini, Claude), then autonomously improves the artifact one criterion at a time until a score threshold is met or circuit breaker fires. "/rulph", "rubric evaluate", "rubric score", "multi-model evaluate", "score and improve", "evaluate and iterate", "grade this", "루브릭 루프", "채점 루프", "자율 개선", "개선 루프", "루브릭 평가"
