Review GitHub PRs and Issues with structured analysis for open source projects. Trigger: When user wants to review PRs (even if first asking what's open), analyze issues, or audit PR/issue backlog. Key phrases: "pr review", "revisar pr", "qué PRs hay", "PRs pendientes", "issues abiertos", "sin atención", "hacer review".
Search the web using DuckDuckGo. Use when you need to find current information, verify facts, look up documentation, or answer questions requiring up-to-date knowledge. Returns titles, URLs, and snippets.
Baidu Scholar academic search skill. Search academic papers, journals, and knowledge resources. Use when user needs academic literature, research papers, or scholarly information.
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Use when the user wants to write blog posts, articles, newsletters, tutorials, case studies, thought leadership pieces, or any long-form content that benefits from research and structured feedback.
Search news using DuckDuckGo. Use when you need to find recent news articles, current events, or breaking news. Returns titles, sources, dates, URLs, and excerpts.
Search GitHub issues, discussions, and PRs for content related to a topic
Research an interviewer online before a meeting using parallel TinyFish agents and return a structured prep report. Use this skill when a user says "research my interviewer", "I have an interview with [name] at [company]", "stalk my interviewer", "find out about [person] before my interview", "who is my interviewer", "prepare for interview with [name]", "look up my interviewer", or any request to learn about a specific person before meeting them professionally.
Generative Engine Optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity).
View, search, and download academic papers from arXiv. Supports API queries, web scraping via Actionbook, and HTML paper reading via ar5iv. Use when user asks about arxiv papers, academic papers, research papers, paper summaries, latest papers, or wants to search/download/read papers.
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer
Web search and research using Perplexity AI. Use when user says "search", "find", "look up", "ask", "research", or "what's the latest" for generic queries. NOT for library/framework docs (use Context7) or workspace questions.
Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.
Audits all existing entries in the awesome-playwright README for staleness, broken links, abandoned projects, or superseded tools. Recommends removals with evidence. Use when user says "audit entries", "audit list", "clean up list", "check existing entries", or "prune list".
Reviews all open pull requests on this awesome-list repo. Researches each linked project (GitHub stars, license, activity), applies the review criteria, and produces a summary with merge/close recommendations and friendly closing comments. Use when user says "review PRs", "review pull requests", "go over PRs", "triage PRs", or "check open PRs".
当用户明确要求"从文件/图片/网页/描述中提取综述主题"或"生成主题+关键词+核心问题结构化输出"时使用。支持文件（PDF/Word/Markdown/Tex）、文件夹、图片、自然语言描述、网页 URL 等多种输入源，自动识别输入类型并提取内容，生成可直接用于 systematic-literature-review 及其他文献综述技能的结构化输出。
当用户明确要求"写/改 NSFC 立项依据""立项依据写作/重构"时使用。基于最小信息表输出价值与必要性、现状不足、科学问题/假说与项目切入点，并保持模板结构不被破坏。适用于 NSFC 及各类科研基金申请书的立项依据写作场景。
当用户明确要求"做系统综述/文献综述/related work/相关工作/文献调研"时使用。AI 自定检索词，多源检索→去重→AI 逐篇阅读并评分（1–10分语义相关性与子主题分组）→按高分优先比例选文→自动生成"综/述"字数预算→资深领域专家自由写作（固定摘要/引言/子主题/讨论/展望/结论），保留正文字数与参考文献数硬校验，强制导出 PDF 与 Word。支持多语言翻译与智能编译（en/zh/ja/de/fr/es）。
当用户明确要求"核查/优化综述 `{主题}_review.tex` 的正文引用"或"运行 check-review-alignment"时使用。通过宿主 AI 的语义理解逐条核查引用是否与文献内容吻合，只在发现致命性引用错误时对"包含引用的句子"做最小化改写，并复用 `systematic-literature-review` 的渲染脚本输出 PDF/Word。核心原则：不为了改而改，无法确定是否为致命性错误时保留原样并在报告中警告。⚠️ 不适用：用户只是想生成系统综述正文（应使用 systematic-literature-review）；用户只是想新增/核对 BibTeX 条目（应使用专门的 bib 管理流程）。
检查 NSFC 标书正文引用与参考文献的一致性与真实性风险（只读）：核查 bibkey 是否存在、BibTeX 字段与 DOI 等格式问题，并生成结构化输入供宿主 AI 逐条评估“正文表述是否真的在引用该文献”；默认仅输出审核报告，不直接修改标书或 .bib（除非用户明确要求）。
Searching internet for technical documentation using llms.txt standard, GitHub repositories via Repomix, and parallel exploration. Use when user needs: (1) Latest documentation for libraries/frameworks, (2) Documentation in llms.txt format, (3) GitHub repository analysis, (4) Documentation without direct llms.txt support, (5) Multiple documentation sources in parallel
