Detects bugs, logic errors, and edge case handling issues in code. Use when reviewing code for runtime errors, null/undefined handling, type errors, and edge cases. Returns structured bug reports with file paths, line numbers, and suggested fixes.
Automatically scan code for security vulnerabilities when user asks if code is secure or shows potentially unsafe code. Performs focused security checks on specific code, functions, or patterns. Invoke when user asks "is this secure?", "security issue?", mentions XSS, SQL injection, or shows security-sensitive code.
Analyze codebase health - large files, test coverage gaps, duplicate code, dead/legacy code, and documentation issues. Use when asked to scan, audit, or assess code quality, find refactoring targets, or identify technical debt.
Analyzes TypeScript/Node.js projects for code quality, type safety, and technical debt
Perform security-focused code review using OWASP guidelines and AI-specific security best practices.
Identifies, categorizes, and articulates code issues with brutal honesty and quantifiable specificity. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, performing code audits, or when user needs direct assessment of code quality.
Static code analysis, complexity metrics, and code quality insights
Review React 19 test quality including coverage, patterns, and React 19 API testing. Use when reviewing tests or test coverage.
Analyze test suites for speed bottlenecks, redundancy, and DRY violations. Use when tests are slow, duplicated, or need refactoring.
Static analysis, code quality checks, and security scanning agent
Thorough code review. Use when reviewing PR, checking code quality, or auditing changes.
This skill analyzes code for design quality improvements across 8 dimensions: Naming, Object Calisthenics, Coupling & Cohesion, Immutability, Domain Integrity, Type System, Simplicity, and Performance. Ensures rigorous, evidence-based analysis by: (1) Understanding code flow first via implementation-analysis protocol, (2) Systematically evaluating each dimension with specific criteria, (3) Providing actionable findings with file:line references. Triggers when users request: code analysis, design review, refactoring opportunities, code quality assessment, architecture evaluation.
Python code review specialist. Use when reviewing Python code, checking for bugs, security issues, or ensuring code quality standards.
Measure test coverage and identify untested areas. Use for coverage checks.
Bug scanning with UBS (Ultimate Bug Scanner). Use before commits, when scanning for bugs, when the user mentions "ubs", "bugs", "scan", or "code quality".
Comprehensive Convex code review checklist for production readiness. Use when auditing a Convex codebase before deployment, reviewing pull requests, or checking for security and performance issues in Convex functions.
Automatically validate implementations in real browsers after code is written or when user says "test this". Uses Chrome DevTools MCP to test responsive breakpoints (320px, 768px, 1024px), check accessibility compliance (WCAG AA contrast, keyboard navigation, ARIA), validate interactions, and generate detailed technical reports with file paths and specific fixes.
Auto-review Go code for 100+ common mistakes when analyzing .go files, discussing Go patterns, or reviewing PRs with Go code. Checks error handling, concurrency, interfaces, performance, testing, and stdlib usage.
Analyze Go test files (*_test.go) for quality issues, anti-patterns, and code smells. This is a Go-specific tool that checks for external dependencies, complexity, flaky patterns, and testing anti-patterns. Use when users ask to check Go test quality, analyze Go tests for issues, find test anti-patterns in Go code, find flaky Go tests, or improve Go test reliability.
Comprehensive code review checking quality, security, and best practices. Triggers: CR, review, 審查, 檢查, check, 看一下, PR, code review, 品質, inspect, 檢視, 看看, 幫看, lint, quality check, 品質檢查, pull request, merge request, MR, diff, 程式碼審查.
Comprehensive Go code review skill for PR reviews, architecture assessment, and test quality analysis. Use when reviewing Go code to ensure adherence to Go best practices, security standards, and project-specific patterns. Applies to full PR reviews, single file/function reviews, architecture evaluation, and test code quality checks.
Audit codebase for performance bottlenecks and thread-safety issues
Review HTML/CSS and React/TypeScript code for WCAG 2.1 Level AA accessibility compliance. Use when the user asks to review code for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, identify accessibility issues, or audit components/pages for a11y standards. Applicable for code reviews, component development, and accessibility testing.
Systematic code review for TapScore focusing on code smells, duplication, architecture violations, and security issues. Use when reviewing code changes before commit or merge. Provides constructive feedback with specific fixes.
