Guides research ethics compliance including IRB protocol preparation, informed consent document drafting, research integrity standards, data management plans, and ethical considerations for human/animal subjects; trigger when users discuss IRB, ethical approval, consent forms, or responsible conduct of research.
Conduct psychological research analysis including mental health, cognitive science, and behavioral studies
Chain-of-thought and step-by-step reasoning prompts for complex problem solving
Lead philosophical inquiry through structured questioning, elicit assumptions, expose contradictions, and guide interlocutors toward deeper understanding
Apply bioethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) and case-based reasoning to healthcare decisions, research protocols, and clinical dilemmas
Prepare ethics applications, develop informed consent protocols, and navigate institutional review processes for human subjects research
Apply theoretical frameworks (postcolonial, feminist, Marxist, post-structuralist) to cultural texts and phenomena
Skill for formal logical reasoning and argument validation
Systematic root cause analysis skill with multiple investigation methodologies.
Navigate institutional review board processes, informed consent, confidentiality, and ethical considerations in human subjects research
Construct, analyze, and evaluate philosophical thought experiments to test intuitions, reveal conceptual commitments, and probe theoretical implications
Integrate scriptural, traditional, and rational sources to formulate coherent theological positions, addressing doctrinal questions within systematic frameworks
Apply propositional, predicate, and modal logic systems to formalize arguments, construct proofs, and evaluate validity using symbolic notation and truth tables
Identify formal and informal logical fallacies in arguments, classify fallacy types, and explain precisely why reasoning fails with reference to logical principles
Evaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge
Apply multiple ethical frameworks (deontological, consequentialist, virtue ethics, care ethics) systematically to moral problems and generate reasoned recommendations
A specialized skill for identifying and correcting logical fallacies in debates. Used by judge and rapporteur agents to evaluate the logical soundness of both sides' arguments and point out errors. Automatically applied in contexts such as 'logical fallacy', 'fallacy detection', 'sophistry', 'argument evaluation', 'logic verification'. However, formal logic theorem proving and mathematical logic verification are outside the scope of this skill.
토론에서 논리적 오류(논증 오류)를 식별하고 교정하는 전문 스킬. judge와 rapporteur 에이전트가 양측 논거의 논리적 건전성을 평가하고 오류를 지적할 때 활용한다. '논리적 오류', '오류 검출', 'logical fallacy', '궤변', '논증 평가', '논리 검증' 등의 맥락에서 자동 적용한다. 단, 형식논리학 정리 증명이나 수학적 논리 검증은 이 스킬의 범위가 아니다.
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches
Research mathematical tasks using domain context and codebase exploration. Invoke for math-language research involving algebra, lattice theory, order theory, topology, and category theory.
Research mathematical logic tasks using domain context and codebase exploration. Invoke for logic-language research involving modal logic, Kripke semantics, and related mathematical foundations.
Research physics formalization tasks using domain context and codebase exploration. Invoke for physics-language research involving dynamical systems, chaos theory, and related formalization.
Research Z3/SMT tasks. Invoke for Z3-language research.
