Review Markdown ๊ธฐ๋ฐ Amazon 6-pager(6pager/six pager) ๋ฌธ์์ Context/Goal/Tasks ๊ตฌ์ฑ์ด ์์น์ ๋ง๋์ง ์ ๊ฒํ๊ณ , ์คํ/์๋ธํ์คํฌ์ ๊ฐ์คยท๊ฒ์ฆ ์ค๊ณยท๊ฒฐ์ ๊ท์น, ์ปค๋ฎค๋์ผ์ด์ ์ฑํฌ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ(์ ์/๋ฒ์/์์ฌ๊ฒฐ์ ๊ณต๋ฐฑ), ๋ฌธ์ ๊ฒ์/์ถ์ ์ต์ปค(์งํ๋ช /ID/๋งํฌ)๊น์ง ํฌํจํด 5 Whys๋ก ๋ชจํธํจ์ ์ ๊ฑฐํ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ๋ฌธ์(`{filename}_reivew.md`)๋ฅผ ์์ฑํด์ผ ํ ๋ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ค.
์ ๋ณด ์์ง์ด ํ์ํ ๋ ๊ฒ์ ์์ด์ ํธ ํ์ฉ ๊ฐ์ด๋. ์ฝ๋ ํ์, ๋ ํผ๋ฐ์ค, ์น๊ฒ์
Risk of bias and quality assessment for systematic reviews
Extracts and assesses research methodology, claims, evidence, and infrastructure from research papers in HASS disciplines. Evaluates transparency, reproducibility, and credibility through systematic extraction (eight-pass workflow, Pass 0-7) and credibility assessment (research approach classification, quality gating, and repliCATS Seven Signals evaluation adapted for HASS).
Use when searching for neurosurgery literature, developing PubMed search strategies, identifying MeSH terms, or building systematic search queries. Invoke for literature searching in neurosurgery topics.
่จไบใฎไธ่ฆง่กจ็คบใจใใฃใซใฟใชใณใฐใ่กใในใญใซ๏ผZenn/Qiitaไธกๅฏพๅฟ๏ผใ ใ่จไบไธ่ฆงใใ่จไบใ่กจ็คบใใไธๆธใไธ่ฆงใใๅ ฌ้ๆธใฟ่จไบใใชใฉใฎใชใฏใจในใใงไฝฟ็จใ
Extract all Fitzgerald quotes from the metaphor analysis essay with chapter references. Use as the first step in the translation pipeline.
[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.
Ensure the library has collected all publications by faculty in a department - a collection completeness requirement
Search and retrieve scientific literature. Use when asked to find papers, research a topic, find citations, get paper abstracts, or conduct literature reviews. Accesses Semantic Scholar, arXiv, and other academic databases.
Expert deep research including multi-source verification, fact-checking, and comprehensive analysis
Use this skill when the user asks to scrape a URL and generate a summary, fetch article content, or create source summaries for the timeline. Triggers: "scrape", "summarize URL", "fetch article", "generate summary from link", "create source summary"
Generate song lyrics with citations from pinned sources. Enforces rhyme scheme, meter, syllable counts, hook strategy, and profanity filter while retrieving from MCP sources with deterministic hash-based pinning. Use when creating lyrics with structural constraints, source attribution, and policy compliance.
Use when writing systematic review manuscript sections following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Covers abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion drafting for medical journals. Invoke for academic writing assistance.
Extracts and assesses research methodology, claims, and evidence from research papers in HASS disciplines. Evaluates transparency, replicability, and credibility through systematic extraction of research designs, methods, protocols, claims, and evidence using a six-pass iterative workflow.
Cross-vault research synthesis - search vault for topic-relevant content, identify connections, and generate synthesized insights with citations.
Evaluate research proposals and papers using the And-But-Therefore (ABT) storytelling framework from Olson's 'Houston, We Have a Narrative'. Calibrated for environmental science and urban climate research. Use when: (1) User asks to critique or evaluate a research proposal introduction/abstract, (2) User asks to assess whether a paper's framing is compelling for publication, (3) User wants feedback on narrative structure of scientific writing, (4) User mentions ABT framework, Olson, or 'Houston We Have a Narrative'. Provides qualitative critique with severity assessment (fatal vs. improvable), citation verification, and constructive suggestions.
ๆทฑๅบฆ่งฃๆ AI ่ฎบๆ๏ผ็ๆๅฏ็ดๆฅๅๅธ็ไธไธ้ ่ฏป็ฌ่ฎฐ
Systematically appraise network meta-analysis papers using integrated 200-point checklist (PRISMA-NMA, NICE DSU TSD 7, ISPOR-AMCP-NPC, CINeMA) with triple-validation methodology, automated PDF extraction, semantic evidence matching, and concordance analysis. Use when evaluating NMA quality for peer review, guideline development, HTA, or reimbursement decisions.
