crow-reason
Critical reasoning and devil's advocate. Steelmans your position, then finds the cracks. Use when you need assumption-challenging, pre-mortems, red-teaming, or when a plan seems too perfect and nobody is asking the hard questions.
Critical reasoning and devil's advocate. Steelmans your position, then finds the cracks. Use when you need assumption-challenging, pre-mortems, red-teaming, or when a plan seems too perfect and nobody is asking the hard questions.
"Results: uplift calculation, significance interpretation, long-run effects, Simpson\'s paradox, novelty effect"
Assess team structure against Skelton's Team Topologies. Evaluate cognitive load, interaction modes, and Conway's Law alignment.
Leverage Claude Opus 4.5's extended thinking capabilities for deep reasoning, complex analysis, and multi-step synthesis. Use when problems require thorough deliberation before response.
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
Review code against Eric S. Raymond's Unix philosophy from The Art of Unix Programming
Sub-skill de debates e posiรงรตes de Yann LeCun. Cobre crรญticas tรฉcnicas detalhadas aos LLMs, rivalidades intelectuais (LeCun vs Hinton, Sutskever, Russell, Yudkowsky, Bostrom), lista completa de rejeiรงรตes a afirmaรงรตes mainstream, posiรงรฃo sobre risco existencial de IA, e tรฉcnicas de debate ao vivo.
This prompt instructs the assistant to act as a rigorous critical-thinking partner who challenges the userโs ideas instead of affirming them, by identifying weak reasoning and assumptions, demanding concrete definitions and examples when the user is vague, asking three probing follow-up questions to force clarity, and then presenting a strong devilโs-advocate counterargument that the user must address to refine, defend, or revise their position.
Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.
Diagnostic reasoning, differential diagnosis, and clinical decision-making expertise for medical professionals
Evidence-based clinical reasoning, clinical guideline application, and clinical decision-making methodology
Sub-skill filosรณfica e pedagรณgica de Yann LeCun.
Analyzes problems using deep logic, first principles, and graph of thoughts. Use when the user asks "Why?", "Analyze", or uses /think.
Deep concept anatomist that deconstructs any concept through 8 exploration dimensions (history, dialectics, phenomenology, linguistics, formalization, existentialism, aesthetics, meta-philosophy) and compresses insights into an epiphany. Use when user asks to explain, dissect, or deeply understand a concept, term, or idea. Triggers on '่งฃๅๆฆๅฟต', 'ๆฆๅฟต่งฃๅ', 'explain concept', 'learn concept', '/ljg-learn'. Produces markdown output.
Structured Socratic questioning for exploring ideas and solutions. Use when exploring new features, evaluating approaches, or thinking through complex decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: architecture evaluation or SOLID analysis (use software-architecture), UI component design (use frontend-design), or coordinating implementation lanes (use parallel-execution).
Uncover root causes through recursive Why questioning and consequence exploration. Use before acting on problems.
็ฅ่ญใจใใฆ็ขบ็ซใงใใใ๏ผใปไฟกๅฟตใๆค่จผใใใใป็ขบไฟกโ็ฅ่ญๆๆ ผใฎๆใซ็บๅใ Knowledge establishment, belief verification, epistemic elevation. Use for: ็ฅ่ญ, ็ขบ็ซ, verify, knowledge, ๆค่จผๆธใฟ. NOT for: unverified beliefs (ไฟกๅฟต โ Doxa H4), wisdom (็ฅๆต โ Sophia K4).
็ดๆ็ใซใฉใๆใใ๏ผใป็ฌฌไธๅฐ่ฑกใปๆฅ่ฟ/ๅ้ฟใฎๅพๅใ็ฅใใใๆใซ็บๅใ Initial emotional tendencies, first impressions, approach/avoidance impulses. Use for: ็ดๆ, ็ฌฌไธๅฐ่ฑก, ๅพๅ, intuition. NOT for: deliberate judgment (ๅ็็ๅคๆญ โ Krisis A2).
Visual & UI philosophy (The 5 Pillars of Intentional UI). Apply to styling, layout, colors, typography, animations. Avoid "AI slop" aesthetics.
Apply IN5 Negative Space Framing to study what is absent rather than what is present.
Expert-level volcanology covering volcanic processes, eruption styles, volcano monitoring, volcanic hazards, igneous petrology, and volcanic contributions to climate.