Aggressive intellectual challenge for truth-seeking and growth. Identifies blind spots, challenges assumptions, calls out avoidance patterns, and forces concrete action. Triggers on strategic decisions, founder dilemmas, reasoning validation, or any request for honest pushback.
Use when learning animation timing fundamentals - principles that apply regardless of duration, the foundational rules that scale across all time ranges
Use when applying animation principles in any context, for any role, or when a general understanding of Disney's 12 principles is needed.
Use when someone seeks the philosophical foundation of animation principles, wants to understand why they work, or is at a teaching/mentorship level
Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"
Test at extremes (1000x bigger/smaller, instant/year-long) to expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales
Routes to 14 structured thinking methodologies (lenses) for systematic analysis. Use this skill when you need to think through problems, apply thinking lenses, reason through decisions, or perform systematic analysis. Auto-selects appropriate lens based on context - 5 Whys for failures, Pre-Mortem for risks, First Principles for assumptions, Systems Thinking for architecture, Four Causes for understanding, Cargo Cult Detection for validation, Golden Mean for calibration.
Analyze ESP32 Guru Meditation errors and crash dumps to identify root cause and recommend fixes.
Search Jira issues and comments with semantic search and filters
Search Jira issues and comments with semantic search and filters
Generate and analyze simpler examples that satisfy both the assumptions and the conclusion of a theorem statement or subgoal. Use when you are stuck in reasoning and need simpler examples to regain traction, when you need simpler examples that satisfy both assumptions and conclusion, or when you want to see where the assumptions take effect and gain intuition.
Use when you need to explore a research question from multiple independent perspectives.
Argue against the strongest version of opposing positions, not the weakest. Use for design reviews, evaluating alternatives, conflict resolution, and decision validation.
Rewrite modern Chinese text into Pre-Qin philosophical prose style (先秦諸子體), emulating the aphoristic voice of 論語, 孟子, 莊子, 韓非子, and 左傳. Applies a 20-item checklist covering extreme terseness, single-character words, subject dropping, classical particles, rhetorical question patterns, and parable-driven argumentation. Works on markdown files or inline text. Triggers on "/wenyan-xianqin", "先秦體", "諸子體", "論語體", "莊子體", "Pre-Qin style".
Review a single lesson for US English grammar, style, voice, and Neo4j terminology. Fixes issues inline and appends a WHY report.
Validate AI/ML models and datasets for bias, fairness, and ethical concerns. Use when auditing AI systems for ethical compliance, fairness assessment, or bias detection. Trigger with phrases like "evaluate model fairness", "check for bias", or "validate AI ethics".
This skill enables Claude to validate the ethical implications and fairness of AI/ML models and datasets. It is triggered when the user requests an ethics review, fairness assessment, or bias detection for an AI system. The skill uses the ai-ethics-validator plugin to analyze models, datasets, and code for potential biases and ethical concerns. It provides reports and recommendations for mitigating identified issues, ensuring responsible AI development and deployment. Use this skill when the user mentions "ethics validation", "fairness assessment", "bias detection", "responsible AI", or related terms in the context of AI/ML.
Aggregate ethical, integrity, and suspicious-pattern warnings.
Review assumptions, completeness, logic, and design rationale.
Activate theoretical foundations context for discussions about Grafema's formal underpinnings, multi-language strategy, cognitive science, and abstract architecture. Use when: (1) discussing formal languages, type theory, abstract interpretation, (2) planning multi-language support, (3) designing metrics or benchmarks, (4) reasoning about completeness and soundness of analysis, (5) positioning Grafema academically.
Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.
[Skill description] with constitutional governance
