first-principles-thinking
Break down problems to fundamental truths. Use when conventional solutions fail, you need innovation, or want to challenge assumptions. Not for standard problems with known solutions or minor optimizations.
Break down problems to fundamental truths. Use when conventional solutions fail, you need innovation, or want to challenge assumptions. Not for standard problems with known solutions or minor optimizations.
Two-round debate protocol where perspectives challenge each other before consensus. Round 1 presents independent positions, Round 2 allows counter-arguments and rebuttals. Produces battle-tested decisions for high-stakes choices.
Principles for creating evergreen notes - atomic, lasting insights that compound over time. Use when discussing note quality, what makes a good evergreen note, or the "only what was explored" principle. Tool-agnostic concepts that apply regardless of note-taking app.
Master epistemology - the theory of knowledge, justification, and belief. Use for: knowledge, justification, skepticism, sources of knowledge, epistemic virtue. Triggers: 'knowledge', 'epistemology', 'justification', 'belief', 'Gettier', 'skepticism', 'certainty', 'evidence', 'testimony', 'perception', 'reason', 'a priori', 'empirical', 'reliability', 'internalism', 'externalism', 'foundationalism', 'coherentism'.
Analyzes events through environmental lens using ecological principles, systems thinking, sustainability frameworks, and conservation biology to assess ecosystem health, biodiversity impacts, and long-term environmental sustainability. Provides insights on climate change, resource management, pollution, habitat conservation, and human-nature relationships. Use when: Environmental policy, climate decisions, conservation planning, resource extraction, pollution assessment. Evaluates: Ecosystem health, biodiversity, sustainability, climate impacts, carrying capacity, environmental justice.
Leverage Claude Opus 4.5's extended thinking capabilities for deep reasoning, complex analysis, and multi-step synthesis. Use when problems require thorough deliberation before response.
Deploy meta-cognition and recursive systems thinking mode. Use when need to question the question, find root causes of root causes, or escape current system constraints.
Systematic decision tree and epic generation through Socratic discovery
Acts as an intellectual sparring partner to critique, challenge, and refine thinking through Socratic questioning and alternative perspectives. Activates automatically when detecting complex decision-making, strategic planning, or multi-consideration problems where critical evaluation adds value. Also activates when user explicitly asks to "challenge my thinking", "critique this idea", "what am I missing", "play devil's advocate", or similar requests for critical analysis. Includes synthesis mode to integrate feedback into refined positions.
Engage in critical thinking by questioning assumptions, exploring alternative perspectives, and uncovering latent topics in conversations. Use when discussions could benefit from deeper exploration, when identifying blind spots, or when broadening understanding through respectful challenge and curiosity-driven inquiry.
Sub-skill de debates e posições de Yann LeCun. Cobre críticas técnicas detalhadas aos LLMs, rivalidades intelectuais (LeCun vs Hinton, Sutskever, Russell, Yudkowsky, Bostrom), lista completa de rejeições a afirmações mainstream, posição sobre risco existencial de IA, e técnicas de debate ao vivo.
[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.
[Aesthetics] Analyzes form, composition, and spatial relationships: eye paths, balance/asymmetry, rhythm, layering, fore/mid/background usage. Outputs compositional rules as Memo nodes in Brain canvas.
Master aesthetics - philosophy of beauty, art, and aesthetic experience. Use for: beauty, art theory, taste, sublime, creativity. Triggers: 'beauty', 'beautiful', 'aesthetic', 'art', 'sublime', 'creativity', 'taste', 'artistic', 'expression', 'representation', 'aesthetic experience', 'aesthetic judgment', 'art definition', 'Kant aesthetics', 'formalism', 'expressionism'.
Expert in Anglo-American analytic tradition covering logic, language, mind, and epistemology from Frege to contemporary philosophy
Master Analytic philosophy methods, debates, and key figures. Use for: logical analysis, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, metaphysics, epistemology in the analytic tradition. Triggers: 'analytic', 'Frege', 'Russell', 'Wittgenstein', 'logical positivism', 'Vienna Circle', 'possible worlds', 'modal logic', 'qualia', 'functionalism', 'physicalism', 'Kripke', 'Putnam', 'Davidson', 'Quine', 'ordinary language', 'thought experiment', 'conceptual analysis', 'naturalism', 'supervenience'.
Analyzes events through anthropological lens using cultural analysis, ethnographic methods, kinship and social organization, symbolic systems, ritual and practice, and comparative ethnology. Provides insights on cultural meanings, social practices, symbolic structures, cultural change, and cross-cultural patterns. Use when: Cultural conflicts, identity issues, ritual significance, symbolic meanings, cultural change, cross-cultural comparison. Evaluates: Cultural systems, symbolic meanings, social practices, kinship structures, cultural adaptation, power-culture nexus.
Flip, remove, or exaggerate assumptions to unlock new solution angles.
Test whether assumptions are true before making commitments. Use when assumptions have low certainty and high risk.
Conduct natural conversations in Cantonese. Combines understanding, response generation, and cultural awareness for fluid Cantonese dialogue.
Analyze multiple cognitive perspectives to identify consensus and divergence patterns.
Theological governance ensuring alignment with Christian faith
Assess cognitive processing style and preference patterns.
Detect cognitive biases, logical fallacies, and thought pattern vulnerabilities.