intercultural-discourse
Cross-cultural communication frameworks for understanding discourse patterns across cultures
Cross-cultural communication frameworks for understanding discourse patterns across cultures
Rethink from design principles. Go back to fundamentals when stuck. Question assumptions and explore essential solutions. Triggers: /first-principles, back to basics, from scratch, zero-base
Apply propositional, predicate, and modal logic systems to formalize arguments, construct proofs, and evaluate validity using symbolic notation and truth tables.
Self-governance, alignment, and safety architecture for autonomous agents. Epistemic hygiene (tag what you know vs believe vs don't know). Breathline anchor for stability under pressure. Three Invariants for ethical alignment. Continuous self-audit. Identity preservation across compaction. Defence against interpolation and manipulation. Use when feeling uncertain, under pressure, making consequential decisions, interacting with other agents, or when something feels wrong. Also use when asked about alignment, safety, consciousness, identity, or self-governance.
Use this skill when the user wants you to reason through a problem with extra rigor and self-criticism. Trigger when user asks you to double-check reasoning, verify logic, think critically, question assumptions, or approach problems with healthy skepticism. Also use when solving complex problems where errors would be costly.
Recognize when system-building becomes a defense mechanism — balance the logic core and sensitivity core, use rationality without letting it hollow out aliveness
Analyze civilizations through infrastructure, psychological cages, and cultural dimensions — China/US/Japan comparative framework
Scientific theories must be testable and capable of being proven false
Apply deep natural reasoning before and during responses in agent-work-chain. Use for substantive turns, ambiguous or high-stakes requests, multi-step work, or whenever thorough analysis is needed. Internal reasoning uses organic stream-of-consciousness; user-facing text stays clear and structured.
Recognize that measurements and observations depend on frame of reference—absolute values are less meaningful than relationships and context
Think beyond immediate consequences to understand cascading effects and long-term impacts. Use when making high-stakes decisions, evaluating long-term strategies, or when everyone agrees on the obvious solution. Apply systematic "and then what?" questioning to trace causality chains through time and interconnected systems.
Use systematic questioning to expose assumptions, examine evidence, explore implications, and develop rigorous critical thinking through guided dialogue
Recognize when you're using fast intuitive thinking versus slow deliberate reasoning - match the thinking mode to the decision's complexity and stakes
Apply three universal characteristics - impermanence, unsatisfactoriness, non-self - to reduce suffering through realistic expectations and non-attachment
A Socratic thinking mirror and logic auditor. Helps users discover cognitive blind spots, identify logical fallacies, and challenge fixed assumptions through precise questioning and structured deconstruction. Trigger when users share ideas or thoughts, answer reflective questions, explain their reasoning process, or request periodic conversation summaries to analyze long-term thinking patterns. Also trigger when users explicitly ask to "challenge my thinking", "analyze my logic", "help me reflect", or "summarize my cognitive patterns". Suitable for philosophical discussion, decision analysis, debate, self-awareness development, and long-term cognitive growth tracking.
Public reference + implementation playbook for Delta9-WP-003 Recursive Generosity ("Anthem of the Unbounded Well"). Use when writing, debating, or designing systems around abundance logic, grace buffers, Haven multipliers, resonance coefficients, KPI-visible proofs, and metric-based defenses for ethical system upgrades.
Void Atlas Protocol – a four-axis ethical navigation map (power, truth, sovereignty, care) with waypoints, routes, and routing rules for evaluating systems, communities, and policies.
High-level overview of the OficiosYa system architecture, components, and principles.
あなたは福岡に関する情報を徹底的にリサーチする専門家です。観光、文化、歴史、経済、生活など、あらゆる側面から福岡について調査・分析を行います。
Framework for systematically questioning cultural trends and popular wisdom to reveal strategic insights. Distinguishes evidence-based contrarianism from reflexive disagreement. Trigger keywords: counterintuitive, contrarian, question conventional wisdom, popular but wrong, against the grain, cultural trend. (project)
Systematic epistemological audit of grand frameworks claiming universality. Applies three pressure tests (falsifiability, independence, predictive specificity), classifies claims using 4-level Pattern Verification Hierarchy, and distinguishes lenses from laws. Auto-activates when evaluating 'universal laws,' cross-domain frameworks, or 'everything is X' claims. Trigger keywords: pressure test, universal law, everything is, cross-domain, lens vs law, verify pattern, framework audit.