home/categories/philosophy-ethics
category focus

Philosophy

Ethics, logic, and reasoning.

1225 skillsall categories
sorting
stars
current ordering strategy
query
all entries
refine the visible subset
philosophy-ethics
2

chinese-political-struggles

解说中国和西欧历史上的政治斗争事件。涵盖中国从先秦到清末、西欧从古罗马到19世纪的宫廷政变、党争、权臣专权、宗教冲突、革命等重大政治斗争,并支持中西对比分析。当用户询问历史政治斗争、宫廷政变、权力斗争时自动触发。

nordeim
nordeim
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

cs-formal

Formal methods: type theory HoTT/System F, logic, Hoare triples, TLA+, Coq/Lean verification

alphaonedev
alphaonedev
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

groundhog-surface

Surface and validate assumptions before committing to action. Pop up, look around, report what's real and what's assumed, then persist the validated ground for future sessions.

AutumnsGrove
AutumnsGrove
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

spx-plan

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

nullmastermind
nullmastermind
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

direct-proof

Prove statements directly by assuming the hypothesis and deriving the conclusion through logical steps. Triggers on "prove directly", "show that", "demonstrate", "verify", "simple proof"

0bserver07
0bserver07
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

critical-thinking-mode

Challenge assumptions, probe reasoning, and drive root-cause clarity with one concise question at a time; do not provide solutions.

kittne
kittne
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

crow-reason

Critical reasoning and devil's advocate. Steelmans your position, then finds the cracks. Use when you need assumption-challenging, pre-mortems, red-teaming, or when a plan seems too perfect and nobody is asking the hard questions.

AutumnsGrove
AutumnsGrove
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

abtesting-analysis

"Results: uplift calculation, significance interpretation, long-run effects, Simpson\'s paradox, novelty effect"

alphaonedev
alphaonedev
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

team-shape

Assess team structure against Skelton's Team Topologies. Evaluate cognitive load, interaction modes, and Conway's Law alignment.

haabe
haabe
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

opus-extended-thinking

Leverage Claude Opus 4.5's extended thinking capabilities for deep reasoning, complex analysis, and multi-step synthesis. Use when problems require thorough deliberation before response.

frankxai
frankxai
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

thoughts

Quick honest take — share thoughts, concerns, or better ideas about the current discussion without a heavy audit

zahardev
zahardev
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

challenge

Pause and push back — surface questions, wrong assumptions, concerns, and better alternatives before proceeding.

zahardev
zahardev
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

thoughts

Quick honest take — share thoughts, concerns, or better ideas about the current discussion without a heavy audit.

zahardev
zahardev
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

openspec-explore

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

dgbau
dgbau
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

unix-review

Review code against Eric S. Raymond's Unix philosophy from The Art of Unix Programming

gdgeek
gdgeek
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

yann-lecun-debate

Sub-skill de debates e posições de Yann LeCun. Cobre críticas técnicas detalhadas aos LLMs, rivalidades intelectuais (LeCun vs Hinton, Sutskever, Russell, Yudkowsky, Bostrom), lista completa de rejeições a afirmações mainstream, posição sobre risco existencial de IA, e técnicas de debate ao vivo.

JantonioFC
JantonioFC
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

train-your-brain-and-challenge-your-thinking

This prompt instructs the assistant to act as a rigorous critical-thinking partner who challenges the user’s ideas instead of affirming them, by identifying weak reasoning and assumptions, demanding concrete definitions and examples when the user is vague, asking three probing follow-up questions to force clarity, and then presenting a strong devil’s-advocate counterargument that the user must address to refine, defend, or revise their position.

BetterPromptme
BetterPromptme
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

critical-reasoning

Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.

JordanCoin
JordanCoin
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

medical-diagnosis

Diagnostic reasoning, differential diagnosis, and clinical decision-making expertise for medical professionals

aizech
aizech
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

clinical-reasoning

Evidence-based clinical reasoning, clinical guideline application, and clinical decision-making methodology

aizech
aizech
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

reasoning-complex-logic

Analyzes problems using deep logic, first principles, and graph of thoughts. Use when the user asks "Why?", "Analyze", or uses /think.

peaceyyy
peaceyyy
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

ljg-learn

Deep concept anatomist that deconstructs any concept through 8 exploration dimensions (history, dialectics, phenomenology, linguistics, formalization, existentialism, aesthetics, meta-philosophy) and compresses insights into an epiphany. Use when user asks to explain, dissect, or deeply understand a concept, term, or idea. Triggers on '解剖概念', '概念解剖', 'explain concept', 'learn concept', '/ljg-learn'. Produces markdown output.

lightxue
lightxue
lifestyle
open
philosophy-ethics
2

brainstorming

Structured Socratic questioning for exploring ideas and solutions. Use when exploring new features, evaluating approaches, or thinking through complex decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: architecture evaluation or SOLID analysis (use software-architecture), UI component design (use frontend-design), or coordinating implementation lanes (use parallel-execution).

Grimblaz
Grimblaz
lifestyle
open
Previous
Page 35 / 52
Next