in6-inverseproof-by-contradiction
Apply IN6 Inverse/Proof by Contradiction to assume a claim is false, derive logical impossibility, thus proving the claim true.
Найдите подходящую возможность для вашего агента.
Apply IN6 Inverse/Proof by Contradiction to assume a claim is false, derive logical impossibility, thus proving the claim true.
Use when tackling unfamiliar topics, designing something new, evaluating approaches, or when the conversation benefits from external perspectives and research. Triggers on questions like "hoe doen anderen dit", "wat bestaat er al", research requests, and unfamiliar domains.
Expert-level climatology covering climate system components, climate forcing and feedbacks, paleoclimatology, climate modeling, and climate change science.
Multi-perspective debate where specialized personas discuss topics in rounds, surface insights through intellectual friction. USE WHEN council, debate, multiple perspectives, should we, decision, trade-offs, weigh options, pros and cons, architectural decision.
Applies the O3 Zētēsis theorem from the Hegemonikón framework for pure exploration. Use this skill when the user asks to generate research requests, reduce uncertainty, formulate hypotheses, or create investigation plans with Perplexity/external sources. Triggers: /zet, 探求, research, 調査依頼, uncertainty, hypothesis testing.
Audit and harden the moral robustness of Vision-Language Model (VLM) pipelines against adversarial perturbations that flip ethical judgments. Implements perturbation probes, flip-rate measurement, and inference-time defenses from Liu et al. (2026). Use when: 'test VLM moral robustness', 'audit VLM safety', 'harden VLM ethical judgments', 'probe model moral consistency', 'red-team VLM morality', 'evaluate VLM alignment stability'.
For constraint problems: eliminate impossibilities before guessing, reduce search space through inference, fail fast on contradictions.
Explains concepts using Socratic-style dialogue. Use when the user asks to explain, teach or help understand a concept like socrates.
Hypothesis-driven investigation using the scientific method. Define goals, form hypotheses, design experiments, measure, analyze, iterate. USE WHEN scientific method, hypothesis, experiment, investigate, debug, diagnose, why is this happening, root cause analysis, test theory.
Provides Islamic knowledge strictly within the Manhaj Salaf (Salafi methodology), adhering to the aqeedah and manhaj of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah based on the understanding of the Salafush Shalih (pious predecessors). Use this skill whenever a user asks about Islamic topics including aqeedah (creed), fiqh (jurisprudence), tazkiyatun nafs (spiritual purification), muamalah (Islamic transactions), fatawa (religious rulings), hadith, Quran tafsir, Islamic daily practices, halal/haram questions, worship (ibadah), marriage and family in Islam, or any question that starts with "dalam Islam", "menurut Islam", "hukum Islam", "bolehkah dalam Islam", "apakah haram", "apa sunnah", or similar Islamic inquiry in any language. Always use this skill for any Islamic religious question, even if phrased casually.
Decompose to axioms, challenge inherited assumptions, reconstruct from verified truths. USE WHEN first principles, fundamental, root cause, decompose, challenge assumptions, rebuild from scratch, physics-based reasoning, why does this work this way.
无惧痛苦创伤,壮胆迎难而上。无视损伤,助你勇往直前,哪怕鲜血淋漓无法站立也能爬至痛苦的结局。抵消本应受到的伤害,甚至将痛苦转化为追寻的兴奋之源。TRIGGER when: 面对痛苦、承受困难、需要忍受创伤时。