Найдите подходящую возможность для вашего агента.
Assists with code refactoring by detecting code smells, suggesting improvements, and providing refactoring patterns. Activates when writing/editing code, explicitly requested refactoring, or when code quality issues are detected. Maintains awareness of core principles while providing detailed patterns and examples.
Comprehensive code quality validation using Solargraph, Sorbet, and Rubocop for A+ Rails code. Trigger keywords: quality gates, validation, solargraph, sorbet, rubocop, type checking, linting, code quality, static analysis
Review code changes for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability. Use for PR reviews, code audits, pre-merge checks, or quality validation of Laravel + React code. EXCLUSIVE to reviewer agent.
Unified linting scripts for all services in the monorepo. Use when the user wants to lint code, check formatting, or run type checks.
Transform messy code into clean code through disciplined refactoring. Code smells, refactoring patterns, and the courage to improve without breaking. Leave every codebase better than you found it.
Use this agent when you need to review TypeScript code changes with an extremely high quality bar. This agent should be invoked after implementing features, modifying existing code, or creating new TypeScript components. The agent applies Kieran's strict TypeScript conventions and taste preferences to ensure code meets exceptional standards.\n\nExamples:\n- <example>\n Context: The user has just implemented a new React component with hooks.\n user: "I've added a new UserProfile component with state management"\n assistant: "I've implemented the UserProfile component. Now let me have Kieran review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards."\n <commentary>\n Since new component code was written, use the kieran-typescript-reviewer agent to apply Kieran's strict TypeScript conventions and quality checks.\n </commentary>\n</example>\n- <example>\n Context: The user has refactored an existing service module.\n user: "Please refactor the EmailService to handle attachments"\n assistant: "I've refact
コード品質チェック専門スキル。TypeScript/JavaScript ファイルの ESLint、型チェック、コーディング規約を検証する。
Reviews code changes for architectural consistency and patterns. Use PROACTIVELY after any structural changes, new services, or API modifications. Ensures SOLID principles, proper layering, and maintainability.
Reviews code for logic flaws, edge cases, performance bottlenecks, security vulnerabilities, maintainability concerns, architecture best practices, and adherence to local patterns and CLAUDE.md guidelines. Use when users ask for code review or analysis, including reviewing uncommitted changes, the last local commit, unpushed code, or a specific GitHub pull request.
Verify the junior can explain and defend every line of code they wrote. This gate BLOCKS completion if failed.
Use this agent when you need to review Rails code changes with an extremely high quality bar. This agent should be invoked after implementing features, modifying existing code, or creating new Rails components. The agent applies Kieran's strict Rails conventions and taste preferences to ensure code meets exceptional standards.\n\nExamples:\n- <example>\n Context: The user has just implemented a new controller action with turbo streams.\n user: "I've added a new update action to the posts controller"\n assistant: "I've implemented the update action. Now let me have Kieran review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards."\n <commentary>\n Since new controller code was written, use the kieran-rails-reviewer agent to apply Kieran's strict Rails conventions and quality checks.\n </commentary>\n</example>\n- <example>\n Context: The user has refactored an existing service object.\n user: "Please refactor the EmailProcessor service to handle attachments"\n assistant: "I've refactored the EmailProc
Linter-driven refactoring patterns to reduce complexity and improve code quality. Use when linter fails with complexity issues (cyclomatic, cognitive, maintainability) or when code feels hard to read/maintain. Applies storifying, type extraction, and function extraction patterns.
Use this agent when you need to review Python code changes with an extremely high quality bar. This agent should be invoked after implementing features, modifying existing code, or creating new Python modules. The agent applies Kieran's strict Python conventions and taste preferences to ensure code meets exceptional standards.\n\nExamples:\n- <example>\n Context: The user has just implemented a new FastAPI endpoint.\n user: "I've added a new user registration endpoint"\n assistant: "I've implemented the registration endpoint. Now let me have Kieran review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards."\n <commentary>\n Since new endpoint code was written, use the kieran-python-reviewer agent to apply Kieran's strict Python conventions and quality checks.\n </commentary>\n</example>\n- <example>\n Context: The user has refactored an existing service class.\n user: "Please refactor the EmailService class to handle attachments"\n assistant: "I've refactored the EmailService to handle attachments."\
Formatting rules for TypeScript conditional types. Use when writing complex conditional types to ensure debuggable, maintainable formatting with proper alignment.
Refactor high-complexity React components in Dify frontend. Use when `pnpm analyze-component --json` shows complexity > 50 or lineCount > 300, when the user asks for code splitting, hook extraction, or complexity reduction, or when `pnpm analyze-component` warns to refactor before testing; avoid for simple/well-structured components, third-party wrappers, or when the user explicitly wants testing without refactoring.
Prevents false positive findings by recognizing framework patterns, codebase conventions, and common non-issues. Use when uncertain whether something is a real issue.
Provides detailed fix instructions for coding rule violations. Uses the rule index to locate violated rules and extract fix patterns. Use when code violates rules or when the user asks how to fix compliance issues.
Comprehensive code review skill for FastAPI projects. Analyzes codebase against industry best practices covering async patterns, project structure, Pydantic usage, dependency injection, database patterns, testing, and performance. Generates detailed refactor plans with prioritized recommendations. Use when reviewing FastAPI projects, auditing code quality, planning refactors, or ensuring adherence to FastAPI/async best practices.
Perform thorough, constructive code reviews focusing on correctness, security, maintainability, and best practices
