education
141
adaptive-hint-sequence-designer
Generate a cascading hint sequence for a problem type, revealing progressively without giving answers. Use when designing tutoring dialogues or scaffolded worksheets.
GarethManning
documentation
запрос активен
Поиск skills
Найдите подходящую возможность для вашего агента.
Популярные запросы
Результаты
53,183
skills, соответствующие запросу
Страница
930
из 2660
Запрос
ai
ищите по названию, тегу или описанию
education
141
ai-facilitated-collaborative-learning-designer
Design AI-supported collaborative tasks that structure group interaction and address participation problems. Use when students struggle to collaborate effectively on group tasks.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
ai-feedback-design-principles
Audit and redesign AI-generated feedback for pedagogical quality, timing, and learning impact. Use when building or reviewing automated feedback in digital learning tools.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
erroneous-example-designer
Design deliberately flawed examples that develop error-detection skills and deepen understanding. Use when students make characteristic errors and need practice spotting mistakes.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
formative-assessment-loop-designer
Design an adaptive assessment loop where each student response triggers the next instructional move. Use when building technology-enhanced formative assessment cycles.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
intelligent-tutoring-dialogue-designer
Script a multi-turn tutoring dialogue with branching responses for anticipated student difficulties. Use when designing AI tutors, chatbot interactions, or structured one-to-one support scripts.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
metacognitive-monitoring-ai-contexts
Design metacognitive checkpoints that prevent AI-assisted learning from bypassing genuine understanding. Use when students use AI tools and may overestimate their own comprehension.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
self-explanation-prompt-designer
Create self-explanation prompts that deepen understanding of worked examples, texts, or diagrams. Use when students read material passively without engaging with underlying principles.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
variation-theory-task-designer
Design a variation theory task using contrast, separation, and fusion to teach critical features of a concept. Use when students confuse similar concepts or fail to discern key distinctions.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
argument-structure-scaffold-generator
Generate argument structure scaffolds using Toulmin, PEEL, or CER frameworks for a specific claim or question. Use when teaching argumentative or analytical writing across any subject.
GarethManning
documentation
education
141
source-credibility-evaluation-protocol
Design a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for digital information. Use when students need to evaluate websites, online sources, or social media claims.
GarethManning
documentation
philosophy-ethics
141
cross-cultural-task-validity-checker
Check an educational practice or task for cultural bias, WEIRD assumptions, and cross-cultural validity. Use when adapting resources for diverse contexts or questioning universal claims.
GarethManning
lifestyle
framework-internals
140
evo-memory
Manages persistent research memory across ideation and experimentation cycles. Maintains two stores: Ideation Memory M_I (feasible/unsuccessful directions) and Experimentation Memory M_E (reusable strategies for data processing, model training, architecture, debugging). Three evolution mechanisms: IDE (after idea-tournament), IVE (after experiment failure — classifies failures as implementation vs fundamental), ESE (after experiment success — extracts reusable strategies). Use when: updating memory after completing idea tournaments or experiment pipelines, classifying why a method failed (implementation vs fundamental failure), starting a new research cycle needing prior knowledge, user mentions 'update memory', 'classify failure', 'what worked before', 'research history', 'evolution'. Do NOT use for running experiments (use experiment-pipeline), debugging experiment code (use experiment-craft), or generating ideas (use idea-tournament).
EvoScientist
development
education
140
paper-planning
Guides pre-writing planning for academic papers with 4 structured steps: story design (task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage), experiment planning (comparisons + ablations), figure design (pipeline + teaser), and 4-week timeline management. Includes counterintuitive planning tactics (write a mock rejection letter to identify weaknesses before writing, narrow before broad claims, design ablations first). Use when: user wants to plan a paper before writing, design story/contributions, plan experiments, create figure sketches, set a writing timeline, or write a pre-emptive rejection letter for planning purposes. Do NOT use for actual writing (use paper-writing), running experiments (use experiment-pipeline), self-reviewing a finished draft (use paper-review), or finding research problems (use research-ideation).
EvoScientist
documentation
academic
140
paper-review
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing. Core method: 5-aspect checklist (contribution sufficiency, writing clarity, results quality, testing completeness, method design), counterintuitive protocol (reject-first simulation, delete unsupported claims, score trust, promote limitations, attack novelty), reverse-outlining, and figure/table quality checks. Use when: user wants to self-review or self-check their own paper draft before submission, stress-test their claims, prepare for reviewer criticism, or mentions 'self-review', 'check my draft', 'is my paper ready'. Do NOT use for writing a peer review of someone else's paper, and do NOT use after receiving actual reviews (use paper-rebuttal instead).
EvoScientist
research
lab-tools
140
experiment-pipeline
Guides structured 4-stage experiment execution with attempt budgets and gate conditions: Stage 1 initial implementation (reproduce baseline), Stage 2 hyperparameter tuning, Stage 3 proposed method validation, Stage 4 ablation study. Integrates with evo-memory (load prior strategies, trigger IVE/ESE) and experiment-craft (5-step diagnostic on failure). Use when: user has a planned experiment, needs to reproduce baselines, organize experiment workflow, or systematically validate a method. Do NOT use for debugging a specific experiment failure (use experiment-craft) or designing which experiments to run (use paper-planning).
EvoScientist
research
lab-tools
140
experiment-craft
Use this skill when the user wants to debug, diagnose, or systematically iterate on an experiment that already exists, or when they need a structured experiment log for tracking runs, hypotheses, failures, results, and next steps during active research. Apply it to underperforming methods, training that will not converge, regressions after a change, inconsistent results across datasets, aimless experimentation without progress, and questions like 'why doesn't this work?', 'no progress after many attempts', or 'how should I investigate this failure?'. Also use it for setting up practical experiment logging/record-keeping that supports debugging and iteration. Do not use it for designing a brand-new experiment pipeline or full experiment program (use experiment-pipeline), generating research ideas, fixing isolated coding/syntax errors, or writing retrospective summaries into research memory/notes/knowledge bases.
EvoScientist
research
smart-contracts
139
contract-decode
EVM contract error and calldata decoder. Use when: user pastes hex revert data, calldata, function selector, or mentions custom error, execution reverted, 4byte, decode. Input contains 0x + 8+ hex chars.
sd0xdev
blockchain
data-engineering
139
gke-reliability
Workflows for ensuring high availability and reliability of GKE workloads.
GoogleCloudPlatform
data-ai