Force critical evaluation of proposals, requirements, or decisions by analyzing from multiple adversarial perspectives. Triggers on: accepting a proposal without pushback, 'sounds good', 'let's go with', design decisions with unstated tradeoffs, unchallenged assumptions, premature consensus. Invoke with /challenge-that.
Search the public web for up-to-date facts. Works out of the box with Jina (default, no API key needed); optionally Serper, Tavily, or Brave Search. Use when workbook context is insufficient and fresh external references are needed.
Check a PR for review comments, evaluate them, and address valid ones
Generate institutional-quality PDF analysis reports for stocks and ETFs. USE WHEN user mentions generate report, create pdf, stock analysis, ticker report, watchlist analysis, OR regenerate reports. Includes VGT-style headers, embedded charts, portfolio sizing, and Perplexity sentiment integration.
Review wizard implementation. Use when asked to "review wizard", "check wizard", "audit wizard implementation", or "/review-wizard".
Use when requesting a focused review with standardized findings format (critical, important, informational) before commit or PR.
Check for pending human review comments on my open PRs across configured repos. Triggers: /check-pr-reviews, "check my PRs", "any pending reviews", "PR review comments", "check review comments"
readings.ts의 요약 필드가 원본 kr 마크다운과 비교하여 잘 작성되었는지 평가합니다. 이슈별로 개선사항을 제안하고 사용자 컨펌 후 readings.ts를 수정합니다. 사용: /eval-summary week1 또는 /eval-summary week1/slug
Web search with full page content extraction. Use this skill whenever the user asks to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up, find recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what are people saying about", or "find articles about". Returns real search results with optional full-page markdown — not just snippets. Provides capabilities beyond Claude's built-in WebSearch.
Trace knowledge artifact lineage and sources. Find orphans, stale citations. Triggers: "where did this come from", "trace this learning", "knowledge lineage".
Adversarial code review using the opposite model. Spawns 1–3 reviewers on the opposing model (Claude spawns Codex, Codex spawns Claude) to challenge work from distinct critical lenses. Triggers: "adversarial review".
Generate a structured literature review outline from a topic and optional paper set. Use when the user wants a review plan or survey structure.
Explore citation relationships around a known paper to find related work, cited papers, and citing papers. Use when the user asks for follow-up reading around a seed paper.
Write LaTeX ML/AI review articles for arXiv using the IEEEtran template and verified BibTeX citations.
Run an independent peer review via codex. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "peer review my spec", "peer review my prompt plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".
Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "address review feedback", "respond to PR comments", "answer review questions", or "address code review".
Full code review: launches `/review-test-coverage`, `/review-correctness`, `/review-security`, `/review-quality`, `/review-api-usage`, and `/peer-review` in parallel and returns combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", or wants a comprehensive code review.
Conduct legal research and risk analysis using GoodLegal MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks a legal question, wants to research case law or legislation, needs a legal risk assessment, or asks about French or EU law. Trigger on any mention of jurisprudence, legal research, contract risk, regulatory analysis, legal memo, or references to GoodLegal tools — even if the user just says something like "can you look into whether this clause is enforceable" or "what does the case law say about X".
Learn and extract writing style patterns from exemplar text for consistent
Detect and flag AI-generated content markers in documentation and prose.
