commit-helper
Analyzes git changes and creates commits with Korean messages following Conventional Commits. Use when the user asks to commit, make commits, organize changes, or says "커밋해줘", "변경사항 정리해줘", "커밋 만들어줘".
Script and automate repetitive tasks and workflows.
Analyzes git changes and creates commits with Korean messages following Conventional Commits. Use when the user asks to commit, make commits, organize changes, or says "커밋해줘", "변경사항 정리해줘", "커밋 만들어줘".
Creates semantic atomic commits using Conventional Commits. Use always when committing changes, staging files, or when asked to commit code. Analyzes diffs, suggests scope, and can split changes into granular commits.
Generate comprehensive, reviewer-ready code review documents from git diffs. Use this when the user provides code changes (git diff output, file changes, or asks to review code changes) and wants a structured review document. Creates detailed analysis covering change overview, business flow, key code explanation, risk assessment, and review recommendations. Supports both manual diff input and automatic git workspace detection. Particularly useful for reviewing pull requests, feature branches, or any code changes requiring thorough documentation for reviewers.
Use this skill to write, validate, or generate commit messages that follow the Conventional Commits specification.
Performs git rebases with intelligent conflict resolution through commit message analysis. This skill should be used when rebasing branches, updating feature branches with latest main/master, resolving rebase conflicts, cleaning up commit history with interactive rebase, or when the user mentions "rebase", "squash commits", "update my branch", or has merge/rebase conflicts to resolve.
Generates git commit messages following conventional commit standards with collaborative attribution. Use when user requests commit message creation, drafting, or help with formatting.
Guidelines for writing conventional commit messages that follow project standards and trigger automated releases
Validate git commit messages, branch naming conventions, and repository hygiene. Returns structured output with validation results for commit format (conventional commits), branch naming, and best practices. Used for quality gates and git workflow validation.
Update development memory (events.jsonl) based on commit metadata and diff analysis. Automatically tracks features, fixes, refactorings, and decisions.
Review GitHub PRs with surgical precision. Flag only high-severity issues (bugs, security, performance, breaking changes) via succinct inline comments on specific lines. Skip style, nits, and minor improvements. High signal, low noise.
Review a GitHub Pull Request as a responsible project owner using the `gh` CLI. Use when the user provides a PR URL (e.g. https://github.com/ORG/REPO/pull/N) or a PR number for the current git repo (prefer upstream, else origin) and wants an owner-grade review document `review-N.md` written in Chinese with copy-pastable GitHub comments in English. Scope the review to lines changed by the PR (do not nitpick unrelated pre-existing code), but apply best practices and flag any clear bugs, security issues, or CI failures caused by the change.
Compare a Clawdbot workspace against the official templates installed with Clawdbot (npm or source) and list missing sections to pull in, especially after upgrades.
Loop-aware skill for iteratively addressing bugbot feedback on PRs. Fetches unresolved bugbot comments, triages them, fixes valid bugs, resolves false positives, and commits changes. Designed to be used with ralph-loop.
Commit with clear messages explaining WHY, following repository conventions
Multi-model code review with structured feedback using LLM Council peer evaluation. Use for PR reviews, code quality checks, or implementation review. Keywords: code review, PR, pull request, quality check, peer review, feedback
Comprehensive quality validation for TypeScript/JavaScript projects - runs TypeScript checks, tests, coverage analysis, build validation, and linting with structured JSON results
Refactoring assessment and patterns. Use after tests pass (GREEN phase) to assess improvement opportunities.
Removes ignored build artifacts (bin, obj, node_modules) to reclaim space and fix ghost build errors. Safely respects .gitignore.
Use when the user asks to analyze package upgrades, check for outdated dependencies, plan npm/NuGet updates, or assess breaking changes in package updates. Triggers on keywords like "upgrade packages", "outdated", "npm update", "breaking changes", "dependency upgrade", "package update", "version upgrade".
Expert in generating functional options for Go structs using the options-gen library.
Diagnose and fix Node.js version mismatches between system Node, .nvmrc, and Electron's embedded Node. Use when you see NODE_MODULE_VERSION errors or native module compilation failures.