Use when searching academic papers, looking up citations, finding authors, or getting paper recommendations using the Semantic Scholar API. Triggers on queries about research papers, academic search, citation analysis, or literature discovery.
Investigative intelligence — document search, entity extraction, and relationship graphing. Analyze document corpuses to find connections between people, organizations, and identifiers.
Compress academic abstracts to meet strict word limits while preserving key information, scientific accuracy, and readability. Supports multiple compression strategies for journal submissions, conference applications, and grant proposals.
Use when determining author order on research manuscripts, assigning CRediT contributor roles for transparency, documenting individual contributions to collaborative projects, or resolving authorship disputes in multi-institutional research. Generates fair and transparent authorship assignments following ICMJE guidelines and CRediT taxonomy. Helps research teams document contributions, resolve disputes, and ensure equitable credit distribution in academic publications.
Use blind-review-sanitizer for academic writing workflows that need structured anonymization, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries for double-blind submission.
Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking.
Use when formatting references for journal submission, converting between citation styles (APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago), generating bibliographies for manuscripts, or ensuring consistent reference formatting. Automatically formats citations and bibliographies in 1000+ academic styles. Ensures reference accuracy, completeness, and compliance with journal requirements. Supports batch conversion and integration with reference managers.
Use conference poster pitch for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
Check for co-authorship conflicts between authors and suggested reviewers
Generates professional cover letters for journal submissions and job applications in medical and academic contexts.
Structures and writes discussion sections for academic papers and research reports. Use when writing a discussion section, interpreting research results, connecting findings to existing literature, addressing study limitations, synthesizing conclusions, or drafting any part of an academic discussion. Helps researchers organize arguments, contextualize data, and produce clear, publication-ready discussion prose.
Monitor bioRxiv/medRxiv preprints and academic discussions to identify emerging research hotspots before they appear in mainstream journals
Grammar checking tool for AMA style medical writing
Simulates NIH study section peer review for grant proposals. Triggers when user wants mock review, critique, or evaluation of a grant proposal before submission. Generates structured critique using official NIH scoring rubric (1-9 scale), identifies weaknesses, provides actionable revision recommendations, and produces a comprehensive review summary similar to actual NIH Summary Statement.
Assists researchers with Institutional Review Board (IRB) application tasks, including drafting informed consent documents, reviewing research protocols for compliance, generating application forms, and preparing submission checklists. Use when the user mentions IRB, Institutional Review Board, research ethics, human subjects research, protocol review, informed consent, or needs help preparing or reviewing an IRB application or submission.
Recommend suitable high-impact factor or domain-specific journals for manuscript submission based on abstract content. Trigger when user provides paper abstract and asks for journal recommendations, impact factor matching, or scope alignment suggestions.
Analyze physician academic influence and collaboration networks
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title. Triggers include requests like "analyze this paper", "critique this study", "is this a strong paper?", "give me similar studies", "prepare me for journal club", "help me understand this bioinformatics paper", "what are the weaknesses here?", or "turn this into a mind map". Also activate for any downstream deliverables such as journal club kits, comparison tables, PI decision briefs, replication starters, or follow-up experiment designs. Do NOT treat as a generic summarizer — this skill performs structured evidence-type classification, track-specific critical appraisal, interpretation-boundary judgment, and research-grade follow-up generation.
Use when finding open access journals, checking journal policies, or identifying predatory publishers. Helps researchers locate legitimate open access venues and avoid publication scams.
