Systematically appraise network meta-analysis papers using integrated 200-point checklist (PRISMA-NMA, NICE DSU TSD 7, ISPOR-AMCP-NPC, CINeMA) with triple-validation methodology, automated PDF extraction, semantic evidence matching, and concordance analysis. Use when evaluating NMA quality for peer review, guideline development, HTA, or reimbursement decisions.
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Uses file-based research tracking, parallel investigation threads, and context-efficient patterns for deep investigations. ALL MEDICAL CITATIONS FROM PUBMED MCP ONLY.
Deep exploration from a key paper. Triggers: 這篇論文的相關研究, 誰引用這篇, 類似文章, related articles, citation tree, paper exploration
Systematically appraise randomized controlled trials using integrated 120-point checklist (CONSORT 2025, Cochrane RoB 2.0, GRADE, TIDieR, Benefits/Harms Assessment, COI Framework) with dual-validation methodology, automated evidence extraction, and comprehensive risk-benefit evaluation. Use when conducting peer review, evaluating RCT quality for systematic reviews, guideline development, assessing intervention benefits and harms, identifying biases, or evaluating conflicts of interest for editorial writing and critical appraisal.
Full text access via Europe PMC, CORE, and other open access sources. Triggers: 全文, fulltext, PDF, open access, 免費下載, PMC, 開放取用
Conduct comprehensive academic research using OpenAlex, PDF extraction, paper search MCPs, and web search. Always produces comprehensive reports with 5+ evidence cards covering conflicting ideas and best approaches. Integrates academic papers (high weight) and non-academic sources (blogs, docs - lower weight but valuable for SOTA). Use when: (1) Researching software architecture patterns, (2) Finding academic papers on technical topics, (3) Conducting literature reviews, (4) Analyzing research papers for evidence-based decisions, (5) Building evidence cards from papers, (6) Finding related works and citations, or (7) When you need grounded, paper-backed technical recommendations. Triggers: research, find papers, literature review, evidence-based, academic research, compare approaches, what does research say, find studies on, search for papers about.
MCP tools quick reference for Giant Swarm operations
Use when extracting entities and relationships, building ontologies, compressing large graphs, or analyzing knowledge structures - provides structural equivalence-based compression achieving 57-95% size reduction, k-bisimulation summarization, categorical quotient constructions, and metagraph hierarchical modeling with scale-invariant properties. Supports recursive refinement through graph topology metrics including |R|/|E| ratios and automorphism analysis.
Teleological physiology analysis framework for understanding biological systems through multi-constraint optimization. Use when analyzing physiological mechanisms, explaining apparent biological "inefficiencies", preparing for medical examinations (CICM/ANZCA Primary), understanding why biological systems are designed the way they are, or when seeking deeper mechanistic understanding beyond descriptive knowledge. Triggers on questions like "why is X designed this way", "what purpose does Y serve", "how is Z optimized", analysis of physiological trade-offs, or exploration of evolutionary/design constraints.
Gene, drug compound, and disease research using NCBI Extended databases. Triggers: 基因, gene, 藥物, drug, compound, PubChem, ClinVar, 變異, variant, 臨床意義
Analyze FDA adverse event data, compare drug safety profiles, detect safety signals, and provide pharmacovigilance insights. Use when users ask about drug side effects, adverse reactions, safety comparisons, FDA recalls, or drug safety for special populations like children, elderly, or pregnant women.
Complete reference for all 35+ PubMed Search MCP tools. Triggers: 工具列表, all tools, 完整功能, tool reference, 有哪些工具
ChimeraX command exploration and MCP operation reference
PICO-based clinical question search. Triggers: PICO, 臨床問題, A比B好嗎, treatment comparison, clinical question, 療效比較
Support clinical trial safety planning using FDA adverse event data. Use when users ask about safety monitoring plans, protocol safety sections, comparator drug safety, or special population considerations for clinical trials.
Errores comunes y soluciones al usar Linear MCP tools. Cubre activación de tools, UUIDs de teams/labels, formato correcto de parámetros, y patrones de uso seguro.
コードレビュー、コミットメッセージ生成、リファクタリング提案、テスト作成支援。静的解析、コーディング規約チェック、セキュリティスキャン。「レビュー」「コミット」「リファクタリング」「テスト」「コード品質」に関する質問で使用。
