Review pull requests for the awesome-web-agents repository. Use when asked to validate a PR, assess whether a submission fits the repo, inspect README or ARCHIVE additions, check merge readiness, or apply the repository's web-agent-first contribution policy to a GitHub pull request.
Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.
Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Access USPTO APIs for patent/trademark searches, examination history (PEDS), assignments, citations, office actions, TSDR, for IP analysis and prior art searches.
Search and retrieve clinical practice guidelines across 12+ authoritative sources including NICE, WHO, ADA, AHA/ACC, NCCN, SIGN, CPIC, CMA, CTFPHC, GIN, MAGICapp, PubMed, EuropePMC, TRIP, and OpenAlex. Use when users ask about clinical guidelines, treatment recommendations, standard of care, evidence-based medicine, or drug-gene dosing recommendations.
Improve academic paper writing quality for ML/CV/NLP-style papers with clear section structure, paragraph flow, and reviewer-facing presentation. Use when drafting or revising Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Method, Experiments, or Conclusion; polishing figures/tables; checking claim-support alignment; or performing self-review before submission.
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
Look up documentation and source code for libraries and packages. Use when the user asks a question about a library, needs to understand a library's API, or when you need information about a library that you don't know about. Triggers on questions like "How do I use X library?", "What's the API for Y?", "Show me how Z library handles this", or when encountering unfamiliar library usage.
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
去除文本中的 AI 生成痕迹。适用于编辑或审阅文本，使其听起来更自然、更像人类书写。 基于维基百科的"AI 写作特征"综合指南。检测并修复以下模式：夸大的象征意义、 宣传性语言、以 -ing 结尾的肤浅分析、模糊的归因、破折号过度使用、三段式法则、 AI 词汇、否定式排比、过多的连接性短语。
Recommend a POI in a city (schema + deterministic result).
Write and debug ast-grep rules for structural code search and rewrite. Use when tasks require AST-aware matching (not plain text), such as finding specific syntax shapes, relational patterns (inside/has), composite logic (all/any/not), or precise code refactors across a codebase.
Use this skill for requests related to web research; it provides a structured approach to conducting comprehensive web research
Search arXiv preprint repository for papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and related fields
General-purpose X/Twitter research agent. Searches X for real-time perspectives, dev discussions, product feedback, cultural takes, breaking news, and expert opinions. Works like a web research agent but uses X as the source. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "/x-research", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic. NOT for: posting tweets or account management. Note: currently uses recent search (last 7 days). Full-archive search is available on the same pay-per-use X API plan but not yet implemented in this skill.
Search biomedical literature from PubMed and bioRxiv for research papers. Use this skill when: (1) Finding research papers on a specific topic or disease, (2) Retrieving recent preprints from bioRxiv, (3) Getting paper titles, abstracts, and metadata, (4) Literature review for drug discovery or biomedical research.
