obs-research
Cross-vault research synthesis - search vault for topic-relevant content, identify connections, and generate synthesized insights with citations.
Cross-vault research synthesis - search vault for topic-relevant content, identify connections, and generate synthesized insights with citations.
Evaluate research proposals and papers using the And-But-Therefore (ABT) storytelling framework from Olson's 'Houston, We Have a Narrative'. Calibrated for environmental science and urban climate research. Use when: (1) User asks to critique or evaluate a research proposal introduction/abstract, (2) User asks to assess whether a paper's framing is compelling for publication, (3) User wants feedback on narrative structure of scientific writing, (4) User mentions ABT framework, Olson, or 'Houston We Have a Narrative'. Provides qualitative critique with severity assessment (fatal vs. improvable), citation verification, and constructive suggestions.
Systematically appraise network meta-analysis papers using integrated 200-point checklist (PRISMA-NMA, NICE DSU TSD 7, ISPOR-AMCP-NPC, CINeMA) with triple-validation methodology, automated PDF extraction, semantic evidence matching, and concordance analysis. Use when evaluating NMA quality for peer review, guideline development, HTA, or reimbursement decisions.
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Uses file-based research tracking, parallel investigation threads, and context-efficient patterns for deep investigations. ALL MEDICAL CITATIONS FROM PUBMED MCP ONLY.
Standard web research workflow and source evaluation (SIFT, lateral reading, CRAAP), search strategy, triangulation, and citations. Use when asked to research topics, gather sources, or validate claims.
웹상의 정보를 '계획(Plan) -> 탐색(Fetch) -> 분석(Synthesize)' 과정을 통해 심층 리서치하고, 출처가 명시된 전문 보고서를 작성합니다.
PRISMA-compliant manuscript drafting for systematic reviews
Use the grok_search tool to search X/web/news via xAI Grok Live Search (paid) and return an answer plus citations.
Use this skill to evaluate, score, and improve essays using Michael Dean's Pattern Language framework. Based on Christopher Alexander's architectural pattern language concept, this provides a systematic approach with 27 interconnected patterns organized into 3 dimensions (Idea, Form, Voice) and 9 elements. Use for essay evaluation, scoring (1-5 per pattern), identifying weaknesses, providing targeted feedback, and guiding systematic improvement.
Search flights, track prices, explore destinations, and find the best travel deals using Google Flights
Deep exploration from a key paper. Triggers: 這篇論文的相關研究, 誰引用這篇, 類似文章, related articles, citation tree, paper exploration
Knowledge retrieval and research patterns using Qdrant for stored knowledge
Comprehensive cardiology editorial writing system for thought leadership newsletters. Use when the user wants to: (1) Identify and score recent landmark trials from top cardiology journals (NEJM, JAMA, Lancet, JACC, EHJ, etc.), (2) Write evidence-based editorials in Eric Topol's style from Ground Truth, (3) Create 500-word commentaries on clinical trials with PubMed citations, (4) Analyze trial importance using hybrid rules + LLM scoring, (5) Write editorials from full papers OR abstract-only scenarios, (6) Build thought leadership content for cardiologists, or (7) Synthesize recent cardiology advances for peers and referring physicians.
Semantic search across Zotero library using cite-assist v3 API for academic research
Fetches and displays the latest articles, top stories, and other content from Hacker News. Use when the user asks about Hacker News, wants to see trending tech news, or requests the latest stories from HN.
Define hallucination categories and evidence thresholds for legal citation errors
技術サイトから特定の技術に関する記事・動画・スライド・論文を抽出・分析します。Qiita、Zenn、Stack Overflow、GitHub、Dev.to、Medium、YouTube、arXiv等50以上のソースから最新記事を検索・フィルタリングし、トレンド分析やキャッチアップに活用できます。
Systematically appraise randomized controlled trials using integrated 120-point checklist (CONSORT 2025, Cochrane RoB 2.0, GRADE, TIDieR, Benefits/Harms Assessment, COI Framework) with dual-validation methodology, automated evidence extraction, and comprehensive risk-benefit evaluation. Use when conducting peer review, evaluating RCT quality for systematic reviews, guideline development, assessing intervention benefits and harms, identifying biases, or evaluating conflicts of interest for editorial writing and critical appraisal.
Search for negative news coverage, controversies, and reputational risks associated with individuals or companies across news sources and media databases
Reviews a blog post for writing quality, spelling errors, and clarity. Use when asked to review, check, or give feedback on a blog post. Defaults to the most recent post in Public/_posts if no specific post is specified.