literature-review
Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Domain-specific literature search for neurosurgery systematic reviews
Cross-referencing in R Markdown documents using bookdown. Use when creating Rmd files that need references to figures, tables, equations, or sections. Triggers on requests for academic reports, technical documents, or any R Markdown with numbered cross-references.
Build PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic literature review systems with RAG-powered analysis in VS Code. Use when researcher needs automated paper retrieval (Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, arXiv), AI-assisted PRISMA screening (50% or 90% threshold), vector database creation (ChromaDB), or research conversation interface. Supports knowledge_repository (comprehensive, 15K+ papers, teaching/exploration) and systematic_review (publication-quality, 50-300 papers, meta-analysis) modes. Conversation-first workflow with 7 stages.
Validate PubMed search field tags against official NCBI documentation before implementing them. Use when adding new field tags to the query builder, debugging search queries, or verifying existing field tag implementations. Prevents invalid tags like [organism] and ensures compliance with NCBI PubMed standards.
Interactive guide for tuning and optimizing the unmangleJS Readability Scoring System(readability.ts) and Semantic Scoring System (semantic.ts). Use when Golden Set validation fails, when scoring heuristics need adjustment, or when improving obfuscation detection accuracy. Emphasizes experiment-driven development: run tests, analyze data, draw conclusions - never guess blindly.
Thematic analysis of qualitative text (interview transcripts, open-ended responses) with participant labeling, codes, theme tables, and quote selection. Use when asked to analyze transcripts, extract codes and themes, build theme tables, or produce tables with original sentences/quotes and participant identifiers.
Full text access via Europe PMC, CORE, and other open access sources. Triggers: 全文, fulltext, PDF, open access, 免費下載, PMC, 開放取用
Search and query Goodreads library from CSV export. Use when the user asks about books, TBR (to-be-read), reading lists, book searches, or mentions Goodreads. Also use for queries about book ratings, authors, reading status, or library statistics.
Query PubMed and scientific databases for protocols, analyze biological data with Biopython, handle HIPAA-compliant data. Use for biology research, protocol searches, sequence analysis, or scientific data handling. Cross-validates sources for high accuracy. Triggers on "PubMed", "biology", "scientific data", "sequences", "protocols", "life sciences", "HIPAA".
Curated daily news briefing across global, local, tech, science, business, and culture. Prioritizes today's news, adapts to user location and interests. Use when user asks for news, daily briefing, what's happening, or current events.
literature-review for evidence-based learning research and evaluation.
Access USPTO APIs for patent/trademark searches, examination history (PEDS), assignments, citations, office actions, TSDR, for IP analysis and prior art searches.
Systematically evaluate scientific manuscripts for methodology, statistics, reproducibility, and scholarly rigor. Provides structured feedback following peer review best practices.
Use when user requests code review with multiple perspectives, wants parallel review from different models, or uses trigger words: super-review, 超级审查, 并行审查, 全面 review
Bibliographic research agent for analyzing books and manuscripts. Builds comprehensive "book biographies" showing production context, textual transmission, related editions, and scholarly networks. Use when asked to research a book's history, find related editions, analyze manuscript transmission, or build bibliographic context.
Orchestrates data collection from Korean webtoon/webnovel platforms (Naver, Kakao, Manta, etc.) and fan engagement sources (Reddit, AO3). This skill should be used when collecting platform metrics for titles, updating title data from source platforms, or gathering intelligence for new titles.
reviewca が review.md を Must/Should/Nit で書き、OK判定条件を付けるための標準。
Conduct comprehensive academic research using OpenAlex, PDF extraction, paper search MCPs, and web search. Always produces comprehensive reports with 5+ evidence cards covering conflicting ideas and best approaches. Integrates academic papers (high weight) and non-academic sources (blogs, docs - lower weight but valuable for SOTA). Use when: (1) Researching software architecture patterns, (2) Finding academic papers on technical topics, (3) Conducting literature reviews, (4) Analyzing research papers for evidence-based decisions, (5) Building evidence cards from papers, (6) Finding related works and citations, or (7) When you need grounded, paper-backed technical recommendations. Triggers: research, find papers, literature review, evidence-based, academic research, compare approaches, what does research say, find studies on, search for papers about.
[22] UNDERSTAND. Deep research from all sources — internal (code, git, logs) AND external (web, docs, best practices). Use when choosing libraries, investigating solutions, understanding legal/technical questions, comparing approaches, or anytime you need comprehensive knowledge from both project context and world knowledge. Triggers on "research", "investigate", "find best approach", "what do others do", "compare options", or complex questions requiring multiple sources.
Use when analyzing YouTube videos for research or learning
data-collection for evidence-based learning research and evaluation.